Skip navigation

putin IS MURDERER

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://oldena.lpnu.ua/handle/ntb/56820
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKulyna, Olha
dc.coverage.temporal22-23 April 2021, Kharkiv
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-23T10:50:18Z-
dc.date.available2022-05-23T10:50:18Z-
dc.date.created2021-05-04
dc.date.issued2021-05-04
dc.identifier.citationKulyna O. Discourse Markers as Means of Compositional Integrity in English Last Wills and Testaments / Olha Kulyna // Computational linguistics and intelligent systems, 22-23 April 2021, Kharkiv. — Lviv ; Kharkiv, 2021. — Vol Vol. II : Proceedings of the 5th International conference, COLINS 2021, Workshop, Kharkiv, Ukraine, April 22-23. — P. 50–57.
dc.identifier.issn2523-4013
dc.identifier.urihttps://ena.lpnu.ua/handle/ntb/56820-
dc.description.abstractA Last Will and Testament as a legal document of Inheritance Law is of particular importance for the life of modern societies of all developed and underdeveloped countries. The research focuses on the complex analysis of the study of English Last Will and Testament as a social and communicative phenomenon which is a repetitive speech act that generates a typical linguistic layout of the content to meet the communicative needs of a testator/testatrix on the issue of the inheritance of property and money after their death in the situation of bequest. The corpus of the research contains 400 wills written in England between 1837 and 2015 (525 023 characters). Attention is paid to discourse markers which provide structural integrity of the text in wills. The main aim of this article is to conduct the analysis of discourse markers found in English Last Wills and Testaments. The classification of discourse markers by B. Fraser has been used in the study. A structural method has been applied to single out groups of discourse markers. Discourse markers of sequence as a subtype of discourse activity markers, parallel discourse markers, contrastive discourse markers, elaborative discourse markers and inferential discourse markers as subtypes of message relationship markers are common in the texts of Last Wills and Testaments. These markers complement the content of a previous statement, combine parts of a sentence, introduce new information, contrast events, actions and even participants. The usage of discourse markers facilities communication and ensures the compositional integrity of the text.
dc.format.extent50-57
dc.language.isoen
dc.relation.ispartofComputational linguistics and intelligent systems, 2021
dc.relation.urihttp://dis.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/8/1/159
dc.relation.urihttp://info.legalzoom.com/
dc.relation.urihttp://www.aclweb.org/anthology/Y14-1052
dc.relation.urihttps://books.google.com.ua/books/about/A_Treatise_of_Testaments_and_Last_Wills.html?id=h34zAAAAIAAJ&redir_esc=y
dc.relation.urihttp://www.wata.cc/forums/uploaded/136_1165014660.pdf
dc.relation.urihttp://www.nzlii.org/nz/legis/consol_act/wa1837121.pdf
dc.subjectLast Will and Testament
dc.subjectdiscourse marker
dc.subjectcompositional integrity
dc.subjectstructural method
dc.titleDiscourse Markers as Means of Compositional Integrity in English Last Wills and Testaments
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.holdercopyrighted by its editors. Use permitted under Creative Commons License Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
dc.rights.holder© 2021 Copyright for the individual papers by the papers’ authors. Copying permitted only for private and academic purposes. This volume is published and
dc.contributor.affiliationLviv Polytechnic National University
dc.format.pages8
dc.identifier.citationenKulyna O. Discourse Markers as Means of Compositional Integrity in English Last Wills and Testaments / Olha Kulyna // Computational linguistics and intelligent systems, 22-23 April 2021, Kharkiv. — Lviv ; Kharkiv, 2021. — Vol Vol. II : Proceedings of the 5th International conference, COLINS 2021, Workshop, Kharkiv, Ukraine, April 22-23. — P. 50–57.
dc.relation.references[1] I. A. Bekhta, T. O. Bekhta, Text in fiction literature: psycholinguistic reflection of the context, Scientific notes of National Univesity “Ostroh Academy”, S. Philology, Ostroh: Publishe NaUOA, 2019. doi: 10.25264/2519-2558-2019-6(74)-11-14.
dc.relation.references[2] O.V. Kulyna, Last Will and Testament as a genre of testamentary discourse and approaches to the study, Scientific note of Mariupol State University, S. Philology, № 17, Mariupol: MDU, 2017, pp. 147‒157.
dc.relation.references[3] O.V. Kulyna, Structural and typological parameters of the genre of Last Will and Testament: based on English wills 1937‒1858, New philology: journal of scientific works, № 69, Zaporizzia: ZNU, 2017, pp. 107‒113.
dc.relation.references[4] A dictionary of American and English Law with definitions of the technical terms of the common and civil law, ed. by S. Rapalje, R. L. Lawrence, 3d ed, Union, New Jersey, 2002.
dc.relation.references[5] A New English dictionary on historical principles: founded mainly on the materials collected by the philological society, ed. by J. A. H. Murray, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1919, Vol. IX, рt. II: Su-Th., Р. 221 (850).
dc.relation.references[6] A new English dictionary on historical principles: founded mainly on the materials collected by the philological society, ed. by J. A. H. Murray, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1919, Vol. IX, рt. II: V-Z. Р. 131 (1228).
dc.relation.references[7] A new English dictionary on historical principles: founded mainly on the materials collected by the philological society, ed. by J. A. H. Murray, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1919, Vol. IX, рt. 1: Si-St., Р. 118 (1228)
dc.relation.references[8] Ch. Bauer-Ramazani, English Discourse Markers. URL: academics.smcvt.edu/cbauerramazani/ AEP/BU113/English /discmarkers.ht.
dc.relation.references[9] T. A. van Dijk, Text and Context. Explorations in the Semantics and Pragmatics of Discourse, London: Longman, 1977.
dc.relation.references[10] T. A. van Dijk, Discourse, context and cognition. Discourse Studies, 2006, Vol. 8 (1), P. 159–177. URL: http://dis.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/8/1/159.
dc.relation.references[11] T. F. van Dijk, Issues in functional discourse analysis. URL:www.citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/ viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.651.9358&rep=repl&type=pdf.
dc.relation.references[12] T. A. van Dijk, Macrostructures: An Interdisciplinary Study of Global Structure in Discourse, Interaction, and Cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erbaum, 1980.
dc.relation.references[13] T. A. van Dijk, Pragmatic Connectives. Journal of Pragmatics, North-Holland Publishing Company, 1979, № 3, pp. 447–456.
dc.relation.references[14] H. A. Dry, J. Lawler, Using computers in linguistics, London: Routledge, 1998.
dc.relation.references[15] C. Ferland, What is the meaning of Last Will and Testament? URL: http://info.legalzoom.com/ meaning-last-testament-3948.html..
dc.relation.references[16] B. Fraser, What are discourse markers? Journal of Pragmatics, 1999, Vol. 31, pp. 931–952.
dc.relation.references[17] B. Fraser, Types of English discourse markers. Acta Linguistica Hungarica, 1988, Vol. 38 (1–4), pp. 19–33.
dc.relation.references[18] B. Fraser, Pragmatic Markers. Pragmatics, 1996, Vol. 6, iss. 2, pp. 167–190.
dc.relation.references[19] G. Redeker, Linguistic markers of discourse structure. Linguistics, 1991, № 29 (6), pp. 1139–1172.
dc.relation.references[20] M. Rysova, K. Rysova, The centre and periphery of discourse connectives, Pacific Asia Conference on language, information and computation: proc. of the 28 th сonf., 2014, pp. 452–459. URL: http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/Y14-1052.
dc.relation.references[21] D. Schiffrin, Approaches to Discourse, Oxford: Cambridge, MA, 1994.
dc.relation.references[22] D. Schiffrin, Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.
dc.relation.references[23] K. J. Sneddon, In the name of God, Amen: language in the Last Wills and Testaments. Quinnipiac Law Review, 2011, Vol. 29, pp. 665–727.
dc.relation.references[24] H. Swinburne, J. Wake, A treatise of Testaments and Last Wills compiled out of the laws, ecclesiastical, civil and canon. W. Clarke and Sons, 1803. URL: https://books.google.com.ua/books/about/A_Treatise_of_Testaments_and_Last_Wills.html?id=h34zAAAAIAAJ&redir_esc=y
dc.relation.references[25] E. Traugott, The role of the development of discourse markers in a theory of grammaticalization, Manchester, 1995. URL: http://www.wata.cc/forums/uploaded/136_1165014660.pdf.
dc.relation.references[26] Wills Act 1837. URL: http://www.nzlii.org/nz/legis/consol_act/wa1837121.pdf
dc.relation.referencesen[1] I. A. Bekhta, T. O. Bekhta, Text in fiction literature: psycholinguistic reflection of the context, Scientific notes of National Univesity "Ostroh Academy", S. Philology, Ostroh: Publishe NaUOA, 2019. doi: 10.25264/2519-2558-2019-6(74)-11-14.
dc.relation.referencesen[2] O.V. Kulyna, Last Will and Testament as a genre of testamentary discourse and approaches to the study, Scientific note of Mariupol State University, S. Philology, No 17, Mariupol: MDU, 2017, pp. 147‒157.
dc.relation.referencesen[3] O.V. Kulyna, Structural and typological parameters of the genre of Last Will and Testament: based on English wills 1937‒1858, New philology: journal of scientific works, No 69, Zaporizzia: ZNU, 2017, pp. 107‒113.
dc.relation.referencesen[4] A dictionary of American and English Law with definitions of the technical terms of the common and civil law, ed. by S. Rapalje, R. L. Lawrence, 3d ed, Union, New Jersey, 2002.
dc.relation.referencesen[5] A New English dictionary on historical principles: founded mainly on the materials collected by the philological society, ed. by J. A. H. Murray, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1919, Vol. IX, rt. II: Su-Th., R. 221 (850).
dc.relation.referencesen[6] A new English dictionary on historical principles: founded mainly on the materials collected by the philological society, ed. by J. A. H. Murray, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1919, Vol. IX, rt. II: V-Z. R. 131 (1228).
dc.relation.referencesen[7] A new English dictionary on historical principles: founded mainly on the materials collected by the philological society, ed. by J. A. H. Murray, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1919, Vol. IX, rt. 1: Si-St., R. 118 (1228)
dc.relation.referencesen[8] Ch. Bauer-Ramazani, English Discourse Markers. URL: academics.smcvt.edu/cbauerramazani/ AEP/BU113/English /discmarkers.ht.
dc.relation.referencesen[9] T. A. van Dijk, Text and Context. Explorations in the Semantics and Pragmatics of Discourse, London: Longman, 1977.
dc.relation.referencesen[10] T. A. van Dijk, Discourse, context and cognition. Discourse Studies, 2006, Vol. 8 (1), P. 159–177. URL: http://dis.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/8/1/159.
dc.relation.referencesen[11] T. F. van Dijk, Issues in functional discourse analysis. URL:www.citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/ viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.651.9358&rep=repl&type=pdf.
dc.relation.referencesen[12] T. A. van Dijk, Macrostructures: An Interdisciplinary Study of Global Structure in Discourse, Interaction, and Cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erbaum, 1980.
dc.relation.referencesen[13] T. A. van Dijk, Pragmatic Connectives. Journal of Pragmatics, North-Holland Publishing Company, 1979, No 3, pp. 447–456.
dc.relation.referencesen[14] H. A. Dry, J. Lawler, Using computers in linguistics, London: Routledge, 1998.
dc.relation.referencesen[15] C. Ferland, What is the meaning of Last Will and Testament? URL: http://info.legalzoom.com/ meaning-last-testament-3948.html..
dc.relation.referencesen[16] B. Fraser, What are discourse markers? Journal of Pragmatics, 1999, Vol. 31, pp. 931–952.
dc.relation.referencesen[17] B. Fraser, Types of English discourse markers. Acta Linguistica Hungarica, 1988, Vol. 38 (1–4), pp. 19–33.
dc.relation.referencesen[18] B. Fraser, Pragmatic Markers. Pragmatics, 1996, Vol. 6, iss. 2, pp. 167–190.
dc.relation.referencesen[19] G. Redeker, Linguistic markers of discourse structure. Linguistics, 1991, No 29 (6), pp. 1139–1172.
dc.relation.referencesen[20] M. Rysova, K. Rysova, The centre and periphery of discourse connectives, Pacific Asia Conference on language, information and computation: proc. of the 28 th sonf., 2014, pp. 452–459. URL: http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/Y14-1052.
dc.relation.referencesen[21] D. Schiffrin, Approaches to Discourse, Oxford: Cambridge, MA, 1994.
dc.relation.referencesen[22] D. Schiffrin, Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.
dc.relation.referencesen[23] K. J. Sneddon, In the name of God, Amen: language in the Last Wills and Testaments. Quinnipiac Law Review, 2011, Vol. 29, pp. 665–727.
dc.relation.referencesen[24] H. Swinburne, J. Wake, A treatise of Testaments and Last Wills compiled out of the laws, ecclesiastical, civil and canon. W. Clarke and Sons, 1803. URL: https://books.google.com.ua/books/about/A_Treatise_of_Testaments_and_Last_Wills.html?id=h34zAAAAIAAJ&redir_esc=y
dc.relation.referencesen[25] E. Traugott, The role of the development of discourse markers in a theory of grammaticalization, Manchester, 1995. URL: http://www.wata.cc/forums/uploaded/136_1165014660.pdf.
dc.relation.referencesen[26] Wills Act 1837. URL: http://www.nzlii.org/nz/legis/consol_act/wa1837121.pdf
dc.citation.spage50
dc.citation.epage57
dc.coverage.placenameЛьвів ; Харків
dc.coverage.placenameLviv ; Kharkiv
Appears in Collections:Computational linguistics and intelligent systems. – 2021 р.

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2021vVol_II___Proceedings_of_the_5th_International_conference_COLINS_2021_Workshop_Kharkiv_Ukraine_April_22-23_Kulyna_O-Discourse_Markers_as_Means_50-57.pdf769.48 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
2021vVol_II___Proceedings_of_the_5th_International_conference_COLINS_2021_Workshop_Kharkiv_Ukraine_April_22-23_Kulyna_O-Discourse_Markers_as_Means_50-57__COVER.png1.12 MBimage/pngView/Open
Show simple item record


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.