https://oldena.lpnu.ua/handle/ntb/52505
Title: | Educational Schedule Development Using Evolution Technologies |
Authors: | Suprun, Oleh Sipko, Olena Snytyuk, Vitaliy |
Affiliation: | Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv Cherkasy State Technological University |
Bibliographic description (Ukraine): | Suprun O. Educational Schedule Development Using Evolution Technologies / Oleh Suprun, Olena Sipko, Vitaliy Snytyuk // Data stream mining and processing : proceedings of the IEEE second international conference, 21-25 August 2018, Lviv. — Львів : Lviv Politechnic Publishing House, 2018. — P. 265–270. — (Dynamic Data Mining & Data Stream Mining). |
Bibliographic description (International): | Suprun O. Educational Schedule Development Using Evolution Technologies / Oleh Suprun, Olena Sipko, Vitaliy Snytyuk // Data stream mining and processing : proceedings of the IEEE second international conference, 21-25 August 2018, Lviv. — Lviv Politechnic Publishing House, 2018. — P. 265–270. — (Dynamic Data Mining & Data Stream Mining). |
Is part of: | Data stream mining and processing : proceedings of the IEEE second international conference, 2018 |
Conference/Event: | IEEE second international conference "Data stream mining and processing" |
Issue Date: | 28-Feb-2018 |
Publisher: | Lviv Politechnic Publishing House |
Place of the edition/event: | Львів |
Temporal Coverage: | 21-25 August 2018, Lviv |
Keywords: | education process schedule development genetic algorithm penalty functions |
Number of pages: | 6 |
Page range: | 265-270 |
Start page: | 265 |
End page: | 270 |
Abstract: | An effective and optimal schedule is one of the keys to obtaining the necessary knowledge and skills by students, as well as creating comfortable conditions for teachers to work. However, in most universities, schedules are still being developed manually, which takes a long time, and always has a certain percentage of subjectivity. This is due to the relevant software inability to take into account the preferences and requirements of students and teachers and to give them the priorities as a human expert can do. The proposed method makes it possible, by conducting surveys among students and faculty members, to determine and take into account their requirements, to evaluate the possibility of fulfilling their desires and to prioritize them, depending on various factors such as material provision, the number of students with certain proposals for the schedule, teacher's position and status, and others. Using evolutionary technologies allows to quickly conduct an analysis that makes possible to perform multiply experiments, changing certain parameters, and choose the best option. The automation of this process guarantees taking into account all the restrictions and desires that a human expert can not handle with when dealing with a large number of students and teachers. This removes the influence of subjectivity. The proposed method was tested on real data, its efficiency and advantages are shown in the paper. |
URI: | https://ena.lpnu.ua/handle/ntb/52505 |
ISBN: | © Національний університет „Львівська політехніка“, 2018 © Національний університет „Львівська політехніка“, 2018 |
Copyright owner: | © Національний університет “Львівська політехніка”, 2018 |
References (Ukraine): | [1] E. Balas “A Note on the Branch-and-Bound Principle,” Operations Research. New York, vol. 16, iss. 2, pp. 442-445, April 1968. [2] E. Burk, and P. Ross, Practice and Theory of Automated Timetabling: First International Conference. Edinburgh: UK, 1995. [3] Y. Yang, and D. Tian, “The research of multimedia curriculum design and curriculum development in modern distance education”, 2016 International Conference on Educational Innovation through Technology (EITT), September 2016. Published in: 2017 3rd IEEE International Conference on Computer and Communications (ICCC), 13-16 Dec. 2017. DOI: 10.1109/CompComm.2017.8322799 [4] E. S. Grant, “A proposal for technology-based software engineering curriculum development,” 2016 IEEE 8th International Conference on Engineering Education (ICEED), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, December 2016. [5] E. S. Grant and V. Shankararaman, “Technology-driven software engineering curriculum development,” 2014 IEEE 27th Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training (CSEE&T), Klagenfurt, Austria, pp. 168-170, April 2014. [6] H. Fugang, C. Le, and Z. Qinhua. “Curriculum Development for Practical Training: A Design-Based Research of Network Detection Combat,” 2016 International Conference on Educational Innovation through Technology (EITT), Tainan, Taiwan, September 2016. [7] W. Yoo, S. Pattaparla, and S. Shaik, “Curriculum development for computing education academy to enhance high school students' interest in computing”, Integrated STEM Education Conference (ISEC), 2016 IEEE, Princeton, NJ, USA, pp. 282 - 284 April 2016. [8] T. L. Saaty, and Kirti Peniwati, Group Decision Making: Drawing out and Reconciling Differences. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 2008. [9] O. Sipko, and V. Y. Snytyuk, “Aspects of formulation of the objective function in the problem of scheduling in higher educational institutions based on subjective preferences,” Nauka i Studia. Polska, Przemyśl: Sp. zoo «Nauka i studia», no. 15 (125), pp. 39-51, 2014. [10] V. Y. Snytyuk, and O. M. Sipko “Penalty Functions Using in the Schedule Development Problem,” Mathematical Machines and Systems, Kyiv, no. 3, pp. 158-164, 2015. |
References (International): | [1] E. Balas "A Note on the Branch-and-Bound Principle," Operations Research. New York, vol. 16, iss. 2, pp. 442-445, April 1968. [2] E. Burk, and P. Ross, Practice and Theory of Automated Timetabling: First International Conference. Edinburgh: UK, 1995. [3] Y. Yang, and D. Tian, "The research of multimedia curriculum design and curriculum development in modern distance education", 2016 International Conference on Educational Innovation through Technology (EITT), September 2016. Published in: 2017 3rd IEEE International Conference on Computer and Communications (ICCC), 13-16 Dec. 2017. DOI: 10.1109/CompComm.2017.8322799 [4] E. S. Grant, "A proposal for technology-based software engineering curriculum development," 2016 IEEE 8th International Conference on Engineering Education (ICEED), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, December 2016. [5] E. S. Grant and V. Shankararaman, "Technology-driven software engineering curriculum development," 2014 IEEE 27th Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training (CSEE&T), Klagenfurt, Austria, pp. 168-170, April 2014. [6] H. Fugang, C. Le, and Z. Qinhua. "Curriculum Development for Practical Training: A Design-Based Research of Network Detection Combat," 2016 International Conference on Educational Innovation through Technology (EITT), Tainan, Taiwan, September 2016. [7] W. Yoo, S. Pattaparla, and S. Shaik, "Curriculum development for computing education academy to enhance high school students' interest in computing", Integrated STEM Education Conference (ISEC), 2016 IEEE, Princeton, NJ, USA, pp. 282 - 284 April 2016. [8] T. L. Saaty, and Kirti Peniwati, Group Decision Making: Drawing out and Reconciling Differences. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 2008. [9] O. Sipko, and V. Y. Snytyuk, "Aspects of formulation of the objective function in the problem of scheduling in higher educational institutions based on subjective preferences," Nauka i Studia. Polska, Przemyśl: Sp. zoo "Nauka i studia", no. 15 (125), pp. 39-51, 2014. [10] V. Y. Snytyuk, and O. M. Sipko "Penalty Functions Using in the Schedule Development Problem," Mathematical Machines and Systems, Kyiv, no. 3, pp. 158-164, 2015. |
Content type: | Conference Abstract |
Appears in Collections: | Data stream mining and processing : proceedings of the IEEE second international conference |
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
2018_Suprun_O-Educational_Schedule_Development_265-270.pdf | 358.32 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open | |
2018_Suprun_O-Educational_Schedule_Development_265-270__COVER.png | 618.34 kB | image/png | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.