Skip navigation

putin IS MURDERER

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://oldena.lpnu.ua/handle/ntb/52505
Title: Educational Schedule Development Using Evolution Technologies
Authors: Suprun, Oleh
Sipko, Olena
Snytyuk, Vitaliy
Affiliation: Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv
Cherkasy State Technological University
Bibliographic description (Ukraine): Suprun O. Educational Schedule Development Using Evolution Technologies / Oleh Suprun, Olena Sipko, Vitaliy Snytyuk // Data stream mining and processing : proceedings of the IEEE second international conference, 21-25 August 2018, Lviv. — Львів : Lviv Politechnic Publishing House, 2018. — P. 265–270. — (Dynamic Data Mining & Data Stream Mining).
Bibliographic description (International): Suprun O. Educational Schedule Development Using Evolution Technologies / Oleh Suprun, Olena Sipko, Vitaliy Snytyuk // Data stream mining and processing : proceedings of the IEEE second international conference, 21-25 August 2018, Lviv. — Lviv Politechnic Publishing House, 2018. — P. 265–270. — (Dynamic Data Mining & Data Stream Mining).
Is part of: Data stream mining and processing : proceedings of the IEEE second international conference, 2018
Conference/Event: IEEE second international conference "Data stream mining and processing"
Issue Date: 28-Feb-2018
Publisher: Lviv Politechnic Publishing House
Place of the edition/event: Львів
Temporal Coverage: 21-25 August 2018, Lviv
Keywords: education process
schedule development
genetic algorithm
penalty functions
Number of pages: 6
Page range: 265-270
Start page: 265
End page: 270
Abstract: An effective and optimal schedule is one of the keys to obtaining the necessary knowledge and skills by students, as well as creating comfortable conditions for teachers to work. However, in most universities, schedules are still being developed manually, which takes a long time, and always has a certain percentage of subjectivity. This is due to the relevant software inability to take into account the preferences and requirements of students and teachers and to give them the priorities as a human expert can do. The proposed method makes it possible, by conducting surveys among students and faculty members, to determine and take into account their requirements, to evaluate the possibility of fulfilling their desires and to prioritize them, depending on various factors such as material provision, the number of students with certain proposals for the schedule, teacher's position and status, and others. Using evolutionary technologies allows to quickly conduct an analysis that makes possible to perform multiply experiments, changing certain parameters, and choose the best option. The automation of this process guarantees taking into account all the restrictions and desires that a human expert can not handle with when dealing with a large number of students and teachers. This removes the influence of subjectivity. The proposed method was tested on real data, its efficiency and advantages are shown in the paper.
URI: https://ena.lpnu.ua/handle/ntb/52505
ISBN: © Національний університет „Львівська політехніка“, 2018
© Національний університет „Львівська політехніка“, 2018
Copyright owner: © Національний університет “Львівська політехніка”, 2018
References (Ukraine): [1] E. Balas “A Note on the Branch-and-Bound Principle,” Operations Research. New York, vol. 16, iss. 2, pp. 442-445, April 1968.
[2] E. Burk, and P. Ross, Practice and Theory of Automated Timetabling: First International Conference. Edinburgh: UK, 1995.
[3] Y. Yang, and D. Tian, “The research of multimedia curriculum design and curriculum development in modern distance education”, 2016 International Conference on Educational Innovation through Technology (EITT), September 2016. Published in: 2017 3rd IEEE International Conference on Computer and Communications (ICCC), 13-16 Dec. 2017. DOI: 10.1109/CompComm.2017.8322799
[4] E. S. Grant, “A proposal for technology-based software engineering curriculum development,” 2016 IEEE 8th International Conference on Engineering Education (ICEED), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, December 2016.
[5] E. S. Grant and V. Shankararaman, “Technology-driven software engineering curriculum development,” 2014 IEEE 27th Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training (CSEE&T), Klagenfurt, Austria, pp. 168-170, April 2014.
[6] H. Fugang, C. Le, and Z. Qinhua. “Curriculum Development for Practical Training: A Design-Based Research of Network Detection Combat,” 2016 International Conference on Educational Innovation through Technology (EITT), Tainan, Taiwan, September 2016.
[7] W. Yoo, S. Pattaparla, and S. Shaik, “Curriculum development for computing education academy to enhance high school students' interest in computing”, Integrated STEM Education Conference (ISEC), 2016 IEEE, Princeton, NJ, USA, pp. 282 - 284 April 2016.
[8] T. L. Saaty, and Kirti Peniwati, Group Decision Making: Drawing out and Reconciling Differences. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 2008.
[9] O. Sipko, and V. Y. Snytyuk, “Aspects of formulation of the objective function in the problem of scheduling in higher educational institutions based on subjective preferences,” Nauka i Studia. Polska, Przemyśl: Sp. zoo «Nauka i studia», no. 15 (125), pp. 39-51, 2014.
[10] V. Y. Snytyuk, and O. M. Sipko “Penalty Functions Using in the Schedule Development Problem,” Mathematical Machines and Systems, Kyiv, no. 3, pp. 158-164, 2015.
References (International): [1] E. Balas "A Note on the Branch-and-Bound Principle," Operations Research. New York, vol. 16, iss. 2, pp. 442-445, April 1968.
[2] E. Burk, and P. Ross, Practice and Theory of Automated Timetabling: First International Conference. Edinburgh: UK, 1995.
[3] Y. Yang, and D. Tian, "The research of multimedia curriculum design and curriculum development in modern distance education", 2016 International Conference on Educational Innovation through Technology (EITT), September 2016. Published in: 2017 3rd IEEE International Conference on Computer and Communications (ICCC), 13-16 Dec. 2017. DOI: 10.1109/CompComm.2017.8322799
[4] E. S. Grant, "A proposal for technology-based software engineering curriculum development," 2016 IEEE 8th International Conference on Engineering Education (ICEED), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, December 2016.
[5] E. S. Grant and V. Shankararaman, "Technology-driven software engineering curriculum development," 2014 IEEE 27th Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training (CSEE&T), Klagenfurt, Austria, pp. 168-170, April 2014.
[6] H. Fugang, C. Le, and Z. Qinhua. "Curriculum Development for Practical Training: A Design-Based Research of Network Detection Combat," 2016 International Conference on Educational Innovation through Technology (EITT), Tainan, Taiwan, September 2016.
[7] W. Yoo, S. Pattaparla, and S. Shaik, "Curriculum development for computing education academy to enhance high school students' interest in computing", Integrated STEM Education Conference (ISEC), 2016 IEEE, Princeton, NJ, USA, pp. 282 - 284 April 2016.
[8] T. L. Saaty, and Kirti Peniwati, Group Decision Making: Drawing out and Reconciling Differences. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 2008.
[9] O. Sipko, and V. Y. Snytyuk, "Aspects of formulation of the objective function in the problem of scheduling in higher educational institutions based on subjective preferences," Nauka i Studia. Polska, Przemyśl: Sp. zoo "Nauka i studia", no. 15 (125), pp. 39-51, 2014.
[10] V. Y. Snytyuk, and O. M. Sipko "Penalty Functions Using in the Schedule Development Problem," Mathematical Machines and Systems, Kyiv, no. 3, pp. 158-164, 2015.
Content type: Conference Abstract
Appears in Collections:Data stream mining and processing : proceedings of the IEEE second international conference

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2018_Suprun_O-Educational_Schedule_Development_265-270.pdf358.32 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
2018_Suprun_O-Educational_Schedule_Development_265-270__COVER.png618.34 kBimage/pngView/Open
Show full item record


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.