DC Field | Value | Language |
dc.contributor.author | Забавська, Христина | |
dc.contributor.author | Zabavska, Khrystyna | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-02-26T08:16:21Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-02-26T08:16:21Z | - |
dc.date.created | 2019-02-26 | |
dc.date.issued | 2019-02-26 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Забавська Х. Квантифікаційні методики дослідження системи стримувань і противаг / Христина Забавська // Гуманітарні візіїї. — Львів : Видавництво Львівської політехніки, 2019. — Том 5. — № 1. — С. 36–42. | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://ena.lpnu.ua/handle/ntb/46059 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Розглянуто основні квантифікаційні методики дослідження системи стримувань і противаг. Враховуючи
основні історичні етапи розвитку ідей щодо функціонування системи стримувань і противаг, основуючись на
порівняльному методі, окреслено основні особливості розуміння функціонування окремих аспектів системи
стримувань і противаг за допомогою використання математичних методів. Запропоновано класифікацію методів кількісного дослідження, а також методики вивчення рівня
президентської влади, порівняльні методики повноважень президента і парламенту, методики розрахунку
парламентських повноважень. Усі характерні особливості застосування цих методик критично проаналізовано.
Зміст кожної методики кількісного аналізу системи стримувань і противаг детально окреслено, а особливу увагу
приділено основним недолікам їх використання під час вивчення системи стримувань і противаг загалом. | |
dc.description.abstract | The article deals with the main quantification methods of the system of checks and balances. Taking into account the
main historical stages of the development of ideas concerning the functioning of the checks and balances system, on the
basis of the comparative method, the main features of understanding the functioning of different aspects of checks and
balances system by using mathematical methods are emphasized.
Having systematized mathematical techniques, the author of the article offers its own typology on the basis of
highlighted criteria. The classification of quantification methods including methods of studying the level of presidentialism,
methods to compare the powers of the president and parliament, methods related to the calculation of parliamentary
powers, is proposed. The features and peculiarities of all these methods are critically considered in the article. Each
quantification methods is analyzed in detail and special attention in the article is paid to the main the disadvantages of their
use in the study of checks and balances system as a whole. The article provides a description of the technics and formulas used in the application of each of methods. It is
emphasized that a part of the methods are used to rank the states in the form of government, while another part is used to
index and create a common list of states by this or that index accordingly. But all of these methods are focused on a specific
component of the checks and balances system and are aimed at the sphere of the influence of a separate political player
indexing. A comprehensive mathematical method for the system of checks and balances as a basic guarantee of democratic functioning needs to be proposed | |
dc.format.extent | 36-42 | |
dc.language.iso | uk | |
dc.publisher | Видавництво Львівської політехніки | |
dc.publisher | Lviv Politechnic Publishing House | |
dc.relation.ispartof | Гуманітарні візіїї, 1 (5), 2019 | |
dc.relation.ispartof | Humanitarian Vision, 1 (5), 2019 | |
dc.subject | стримування | |
dc.subject | противаги | |
dc.subject | методика | |
dc.subject | чисельні методи | |
dc.subject | індекс | |
dc.subject | гілки влади | |
dc.subject | кластерний аналіз | |
dc.subject | ранжування | |
dc.subject | система | |
dc.subject | формула | |
dc.subject | checks | |
dc.subject | balances | |
dc.subject | method | |
dc.subject | quantification methods | |
dc.subject | index | |
dc.subject | branches of power | |
dc.subject | cluster analysis | |
dc.subject | ranking | |
dc.subject | system | |
dc.subject | formula | |
dc.title | Квантифікаційні методики дослідження системи стримувань і противаг | |
dc.title.alternative | Quantification methods of the checks and balances system study | |
dc.type | Article | |
dc.rights.holder | © Національний університет “Львівська політехніка”, 2019 | |
dc.rights.holder | © Забавська Х., 2019 р. | |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Національний університет “Львівська політехніка” | |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Lviv Polytechnic National University | |
dc.format.pages | 7 | |
dc.identifier.citationen | Zabavska K. Quantification methods of the checks and balances system study / Khrystyna Zabavska // Humanitarian Vision. — Lviv : Lviv Politechnic Publishing House, 2019. — Vol 5. — No 1. — P. 36–42. | |
dc.relation.references | Лебедюк, В. (2013). Трансформація партійних | |
dc.relation.references | систем у пострадянських країнах. Науковий часопис НПУ | |
dc.relation.references | імені М. П. Драгоманова, Вип.: спец. вип., 222–229. | |
dc.relation.references | Локшин, И. (2013). Индекс величины политических | |
dc.relation.references | ставок. Москва: Изд. дом Высшей школы экономики. | |
dc.relation.references | Романюк, А., Литвин, В. (2016). Порівняльний аналіз | |
dc.relation.references | політичних інститутів країн Вишеградської групи та інших | |
dc.relation.references | країн Центрально-Східної Європи. Львів: ЛНУ ім. Івана Франка. | |
dc.relation.references | Серьогіна, С. (2008). Типологізація форм правління | |
dc.relation.references | методами індексного та кластерного аналізу: сучасний стан | |
dc.relation.references | і перспективи розвитку. Державне будівництво та місцеве | |
dc.relation.references | самоврядування, Вип. 16, 3–15. | |
dc.relation.references | Хеллман, Дж. (1996). Конституции и экономическая | |
dc.relation.references | реформа в переходный период. Конституционное право: | |
dc.relation.references | восточноевропейское обозрение, № 2, 16–26. | |
dc.relation.references | Шестак, Н. (2014). Емпіричні методи дослідження | |
dc.relation.references | політичних партій та партійних систем. Вісник Львівського | |
dc.relation.references | університету. Серія філософсько-політологічні студії. | |
dc.relation.references | Вип. 5, 144–155. | |
dc.relation.references | Brams, S. (1968). Measuring the Concentration of | |
dc.relation.references | Power in Political Systems. The American Political Science | |
dc.relation.references | Review, Vol. 62(2), 461–475. | |
dc.relation.references | Fish, S., Kroenig, M. (2011). The Handbook of | |
dc.relation.references | National Legislatures: A Global Survey. Cambridge University Press. | |
dc.relation.references | Frye, T. (1997). A Politics of Institutional Choice: PostCommunist Presidencies. Comparative Political Studies, Vol. 30, 523–552. | |
dc.relation.references | Golosov, G. (2009). The Effective Number Of Parties: | |
dc.relation.references | A New Approach. Party Politics, Vol. 10, 171–192. | |
dc.relation.references | Johannsen, L., Norgaard, O. (2003). IPA: The Index of | |
dc.relation.references | Presidential Authority. Explorations into the Measurement and | |
dc.relation.references | Impact of a Political Institution. Paper prepared for the ECPR | |
dc.relation.references | Joint Sessions of Workshops, 24–27. New Orleans, LA. | |
dc.relation.references | Krouwel, A. (2003). Measuring presidentialism and | |
dc.relation.references | parliamentarism: An Application to Central and East European | |
dc.relation.references | Countries. Acta Politica, Vol. 38, 333–364. | |
dc.relation.references | Laasko, M., Taagepera, R. (1979). Effective Number | |
dc.relation.references | of Parties: A Measure with Application to West Europe. | |
dc.relation.references | Comparative Political Studies, Vol. 12, 3–27. | |
dc.relation.references | McGregor, J. (1994). The Presidency in East Central | |
dc.relation.references | Europe. RL Research Report, Vol. 3, 12–16. | |
dc.relation.references | Metcalf, L. (2000). Measuring Presidential Power. | |
dc.relation.references | Comparative Political Studies, Vol. 33(5), 660–685. | |
dc.relation.references | Shugart, M. S., Carey, J. M. (1992). Presidents and | |
dc.relation.references | Assemblies. Constitutional Design and Electoral Dynamics. | |
dc.relation.references | Cambridge University Press. | |
dc.relation.references | Siaroff, P. (2003). Comparative Presidencies: The | |
dc.relation.references | Inadequacy of the Presidential, Semi-Presidential and | |
dc.relation.references | Parliamentary Distinction. European Journal of Political | |
dc.relation.references | Research, Vol. 42 (3), 287–312. | |
dc.relation.references | Zaznaev, O. (2014). Measuring Presidential Power: | |
dc.relation.references | A Review of Contemporary Methods. Mediterranean Journal | |
dc.relation.references | of Social Sciences, Vol. 5, 569–573. | |
dc.relation.referencesen | Brams, S. (1968). Measuring the Concentration of | |
dc.relation.referencesen | Power in Political Systems. The American Political Science | |
dc.relation.referencesen | Review, Vol. 62(2), 461–475. | |
dc.relation.referencesen | Fish, S., Kroenig, M. (2011). The Handbook of National | |
dc.relation.referencesen | Legislatures: A Global Survey. Cambridge University Press. | |
dc.relation.referencesen | Frye, T. (1997). A Politics of Institutional Choice: PostCommunist Presidencies. Comparative Political Studies, | |
dc.relation.referencesen | Vol. 30, 523–552 | |
dc.relation.referencesen | Golosov, G. (2009). The Effective Number Of Parties: | |
dc.relation.referencesen | A New Approach. Party Politics, Vol. 10, 171–192. | |
dc.relation.referencesen | Hellman, J. (1996). The Constitution and Economic | |
dc.relation.referencesen | Reform during the Transition Period. [In Russian]. | |
dc.relation.referencesen | Constitutional Law: East European Review, Vol. 2, 16–26. | |
dc.relation.referencesen | Johannsen, L., Norgaard O. (2003). IPA: The Index of | |
dc.relation.referencesen | Presidential Authority. Explorations into the Measurement and | |
dc.relation.referencesen | Impact of a Political Institution. Paper prepared for the ECPR | |
dc.relation.referencesen | Joint Sessions of Workshops, 24–27. New Orleans, LA. | |
dc.relation.referencesen | Krouwel, A. (2003). Measuring presidentialism and | |
dc.relation.referencesen | parliamentarism: An Application to Central and East European | |
dc.relation.referencesen | Countries. Acta Politica, Vol. 38, 333–364. | |
dc.relation.referencesen | Laasko, M., Taagepera, R. (1979). Effective Number | |
dc.relation.referencesen | of Parties: A Measure with Application to West Europe. | |
dc.relation.referencesen | Comparative Political Studies, Vol 12, 3–27. | |
dc.relation.referencesen | Lebedyuk, V. (2013). The Transformation of Party | |
dc.relation.referencesen | Systems in Post-Soviet Countries. [In Ukrainian]. Scientific | |
dc.relation.referencesen | journal of Drahomanov NPU: Special Issue, 222–229. | |
dc.relation.referencesen | Lokshyn, I. (2013). The Index of the Size of Political | |
dc.relation.referencesen | Rates. [In Russian]. Moscow: House of the Higher School of Economics. | |
dc.relation.referencesen | McGregor, J. (1994).The Presidency in East Central | |
dc.relation.referencesen | Europe. RL Research Report, Vol. 3, 12–16. | |
dc.relation.referencesen | Metcalf, L. (2000). Measuring Presidential Power. | |
dc.relation.referencesen | Comparative Political Studies, Vol. 33(5), 660–685. | |
dc.relation.referencesen | Seriohina, S. G. (2008). Typologization of Forms | |
dc.relation.referencesen | of Governance by Methods of Index and Cluster Analysis: | |
dc.relation.referencesen | the Current State and Prospects of Development. [In | |
dc.relation.referencesen | Ukrainian]. Public Construction and Local Government, Vol. 16, 3–15. | |
dc.relation.referencesen | Shestak, N. (2014). Empirical Methods of Research of | |
dc.relation.referencesen | Political Parties and Party Systems. [In Ukrainian]. Visnyk of | |
dc.relation.referencesen | Lviv University. A series of philosophical and political studies, Vol. 5, 144–155. | |
dc.relation.referencesen | Shugart, M. S., Carey, J. M. (1992). Presidents and | |
dc.relation.referencesen | Assemblies. Constitutional Design and Electoral Dynamics. | |
dc.relation.referencesen | Cambridge University Press. | |
dc.relation.referencesen | Siaroff, P. (2003). Comparative Presidencies: The | |
dc.relation.referencesen | Inadequacy of the Presidential, Semi-Presidential and | |
dc.relation.referencesen | Parliamentary Distinction. European Journal of Political | |
dc.relation.referencesen | Research, Vol. 42 (3), 287–312. | |
dc.relation.referencesen | Romanyuk, A., Lytvyn, V. (2016). Comparative | |
dc.relation.referencesen | Analysis of Political Institutions of the Countries of the | |
dc.relation.referencesen | Visegrad Group and Other Countries of Central and Eastern | |
dc.relation.referencesen | Europe. [In Ukrainian]. Lviv: Ivan Franko University of Lviv Publishing House. | |
dc.relation.referencesen | Zaznaev, O. (2014). Measuring Presidential Power: | |
dc.relation.referencesen | A Review of Contemporary Methods. Mediterranean Journal | |
dc.relation.referencesen | of Social Sciences, Vol. 5, 569–573. | |
dc.citation.journalTitle | Гуманітарні візіїї | |
dc.citation.volume | 5 | |
dc.citation.issue | 1 | |
dc.citation.spage | 36 | |
dc.citation.epage | 42 | |
dc.coverage.placename | Львів | |
dc.coverage.placename | Lviv | |
dc.subject.udc | 321.7 | |
Appears in Collections: | Humanitarian Vision. – 2019. – Vol. 5, No. 1
|