https://oldena.lpnu.ua/handle/ntb/45993
Title: | The effective hydropower potential of the Mszanka River in South Poland – the course of estimation |
Authors: | Operacz, Agnieszka Kotowski, Tomasz Bugajski, Piotr |
Affiliation: | University of Agriculture in Krakow |
Bibliographic description (Ukraine): | Operacz A. The effective hydropower potential of the Mszanka River in South Poland – the course of estimation / Agnieszka Operacz, Tomasz Kotowski, Piotr Bugajski // Environmental problems. — Lviv : Lviv Politechnic Publishing House, 2018. — Vol 3. — No 3. — P. 193–202. |
Bibliographic description (International): | Operacz A. The effective hydropower potential of the Mszanka River in South Poland – the course of estimation / Agnieszka Operacz, Tomasz Kotowski, Piotr Bugajski // Environmental problems. — Lviv : Lviv Politechnic Publishing House, 2018. — Vol 3. — No 3. — P. 193–202. |
Is part of: | Environmental problems, 3 (3), 2018 |
Issue: | 3 |
Issue Date: | 26-Oct-2018 |
Publisher: | Lviv Politechnic Publishing House |
Place of the edition/event: | Львів Lviv |
Keywords: | hydropower potential RES sustainable management small HPP |
Number of pages: | 10 |
Page range: | 193-202 |
Start page: | 193 |
End page: | 202 |
Abstract: | The aim of the paper was to calculate the actual (called “effective”) hydropower potential based on the identification of real possibilities of small hydro power plants realization. As an example river Mszanka in South Poland was chosen. The course of estimation was shown in Polish conditions of law, procedures and environmental barriers. The comparison of estimated values of effective potential was done with theoretical and technical potential. |
URI: | https://ena.lpnu.ua/handle/ntb/45993 |
Copyright owner: | © Національний університет “Львівська політехніка”, 2018 © Operacz A., Kotowski T., Bugajski P., 2018 |
URL for reference material: | https://doi.org/10.1002/ep.12121 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.141 https://bip.malopolska.pl/rzgwkrakow/Article/get/id,848610.html https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.098 http://ekonomiaisrodowisko.pl/uploads/ekonomiaisrodowisko52/06_operacz.pdf https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/59294 http://www.restor-hydro.eu/en/tools/mills-map/ |
References (Ukraine): | 1. Allwood J. M., V. Bosetti, N. K. Dubash, L. GómezEcheverri, von Stechow C.: Glossary. In: Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA 2014. 2. Stangeland A., Grini G.: The potential and barriers for RE. Bellona Paper, Oslo, Norway, 2007. 3. Hoogwijk M., Graus W.: Global potential of RES: a literature assessment. Background report prepared by order of REN21. Ecofys, PECSNL072975, 2008. 4. Krewitt W., Simon S., Pregger T.: RE deployment potentials in large economies. DLR (German Aerospace Center), 2008. 5. Resch G., Held A., Faber T., Panzer C., Toro F., Haas R., 2008. Energy Policy, 2008, 36 (11), 4048. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2008.06.029 6. Verbruggen A., Fischedick M., Moomaw W., Weir T., Nadai A., Nilsson L. J., Nyboer J., Sathaye J., Energy Policy, 2010, 38 (2), 850. 7. Ataei, A., Biglari, M., Nedaei, M., Assareh, E., Choi, J.-K., Yoo, C. and Adaramola, M. S. Environ. Prog. Sustainable Energy 2015, 34, 1521. https://doi.org/10.1002/ep.12121 8. Esen H., Mustafa I., Esen M. Building and Environment, 2007, 42(5), 1955. DOI:10.1016/j.buildenv.2006.04.007 9. Izadyar N., Ong Ch. H., Chong W. T., Leong K. Y. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2016, 62, 908. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2016.05.005 10. Resch G., Held A., Faber T., Panzer Ch., Toro F., Haas R. Energy Policy, 2008, 36 (11), 4048. doi:10.1016/j.enpol. 2008.06.029 11. Zimny J., Michalak P., Bielik S., Szczotka K. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2013, 21, 117. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2012.12.049 12. Ferreira J. H. I., Camacho J. R. C., Malagoli J. A., Guimaraes JR. S. C. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2016, 56, 380. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.11.035 13. Farooq M. K., Kumar S. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev, 2013, 20, 240. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2012.09.042 14. Painuly J. P. Renew Energy, 2001, 24 (1), 73. doi:10.1016/S0960-1481(00)00186-5 15. Sample J. E., Duncan N., Ferguson M., Cooksley S. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2015, 52, 111. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.07.071 16. Morales S., Alvares C., Acevedo C., Diaz C., Rodriguez M., Pacheco L. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2015, 50, 1650. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.06.026 17. Operacz, A. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2017, 75 (9), 1453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.141 18. Resolution no 4/2014 of the RZGW Director in Krakow [in Polish] https://bip.malopolska.pl/rzgwkrakow/Article/get/id,848610.html 19. IMGW 1980: Przepływy charakterystyczne rzek Polski w latach 1951–1970. WKiŁ., Warszawa [in Polish]. 20. Grela J., Stochliński T. 2005: O metodach wyznaczenia wielkości przepływu nienaruszalnego. “Aura” no. 6. [in Polish] 21. Operacz A., Wałęga A., Cupak A., Tomaszewska B. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, 193, 575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.098 22. Operacz A. Economics and Environment, 2015, 1(52), 100. [in Polish] http://ekonomiaisrodowisko.pl/uploads/ekonomiaisrodowisko52/06_operacz.pdf 23. Kostrzewa H. 2005: Weryfikacja kryteriów i wielkości przepływu nienaruszalnego dla rzek Polski. Materiały Badawcze, Seria Gospodarka Wodna i Ochrona Wód., Warszawa. [in Polish] 24. Wałęga A., Młyński D., Kokoszka R., Miernik W. 2014. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 24 (6), 2663–2676. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/59294 25. Restor-Hydro map, http://www.restor-hydro.eu/en/tools/mills-map/ 26. Kaczor G., Bergel T., Bugajski P., Pijanowski J. 2015. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, Hard Olsztyn. Vol. 24, No. 1, 107–114. [DOI: 10.15244/pjoes/28355] |
References (International): | 1. Allwood J. M., V. Bosetti, N. K. Dubash, L. GómezEcheverri, von Stechow C., Glossary. In: Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA 2014. 2. Stangeland A., Grini G., The potential and barriers for RE. Bellona Paper, Oslo, Norway, 2007. 3. Hoogwijk M., Graus W., Global potential of RES: a literature assessment. Background report prepared by order of REN21. Ecofys, PECSNL072975, 2008. 4. Krewitt W., Simon S., Pregger T., RE deployment potentials in large economies. DLR (German Aerospace Center), 2008. 5. Resch G., Held A., Faber T., Panzer C., Toro F., Haas R., 2008. Energy Policy, 2008, 36 (11), 4048. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2008.06.029 6. Verbruggen A., Fischedick M., Moomaw W., Weir T., Nadai A., Nilsson L. J., Nyboer J., Sathaye J., Energy Policy, 2010, 38 (2), 850. 7. Ataei, A., Biglari, M., Nedaei, M., Assareh, E., Choi, J.-K., Yoo, C. and Adaramola, M. S. Environ. Prog. Sustainable Energy 2015, 34, 1521. https://doi.org/10.1002/ep.12121 8. Esen H., Mustafa I., Esen M. Building and Environment, 2007, 42(5), 1955. DOI:10.1016/j.buildenv.2006.04.007 9. Izadyar N., Ong Ch. H., Chong W. T., Leong K. Y. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2016, 62, 908. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2016.05.005 10. Resch G., Held A., Faber T., Panzer Ch., Toro F., Haas R. Energy Policy, 2008, 36 (11), 4048. doi:10.1016/j.enpol. 2008.06.029 11. Zimny J., Michalak P., Bielik S., Szczotka K. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2013, 21, 117. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2012.12.049 12. Ferreira J. H. I., Camacho J. R. C., Malagoli J. A., Guimaraes JR. S. C. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2016, 56, 380. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.11.035 13. Farooq M. K., Kumar S. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev, 2013, 20, 240. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2012.09.042 14. Painuly J. P. Renew Energy, 2001, 24 (1), 73. doi:10.1016/S0960-1481(00)00186-5 15. Sample J. E., Duncan N., Ferguson M., Cooksley S. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2015, 52, 111. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.07.071 16. Morales S., Alvares C., Acevedo C., Diaz C., Rodriguez M., Pacheco L. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2015, 50, 1650. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.06.026 17. Operacz, A. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2017, 75 (9), 1453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.141 18. Resolution no 4/2014 of the RZGW Director in Krakow [in Polish] https://bip.malopolska.pl/rzgwkrakow/Article/get/id,848610.html 19. IMGW 1980: Przepływy charakterystyczne rzek Polski w latach 1951–1970. WKiŁ., Warszawa [in Polish]. 20. Grela J., Stochliński T. 2005: O metodach wyznaczenia wielkości przepływu nienaruszalnego. "Aura" no. 6. [in Polish] 21. Operacz A., Wałęga A., Cupak A., Tomaszewska B. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, 193, 575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.098 22. Operacz A. Economics and Environment, 2015, 1(52), 100. [in Polish] http://ekonomiaisrodowisko.pl/uploads/ekonomiaisrodowisko52/06_operacz.pdf 23. Kostrzewa H. 2005: Weryfikacja kryteriów i wielkości przepływu nienaruszalnego dla rzek Polski. Materiały Badawcze, Seria Gospodarka Wodna i Ochrona Wód., Warszawa. [in Polish] 24. Wałęga A., Młyński D., Kokoszka R., Miernik W. 2014. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 24 (6), 2663–2676. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/59294 25. Restor-Hydro map, http://www.restor-hydro.eu/en/tools/mills-map/ 26. Kaczor G., Bergel T., Bugajski P., Pijanowski J. 2015. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, Hard Olsztyn. Vol. 24, No. 1, 107–114. [DOI: 10.15244/pjoes/28355] |
Content type: | Article |
Appears in Collections: | Environmental Problems. – 2018. – Vol. 3, No. 3 |
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
2018v3n3_Operacz_A-The_effective_hydropower_193-202.pdf | 511.39 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open | |
2018v3n3_Operacz_A-The_effective_hydropower_193-202__COVER.png | 434.48 kB | image/png | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.