Skip navigation

putin IS MURDERER

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://oldena.lpnu.ua/handle/ntb/45993
Title: The effective hydropower potential of the Mszanka River in South Poland – the course of estimation
Authors: Operacz, Agnieszka
Kotowski, Tomasz
Bugajski, Piotr
Affiliation: University of Agriculture in Krakow
Bibliographic description (Ukraine): Operacz A. The effective hydropower potential of the Mszanka River in South Poland – the course of estimation / Agnieszka Operacz, Tomasz Kotowski, Piotr Bugajski // Environmental problems. — Lviv : Lviv Politechnic Publishing House, 2018. — Vol 3. — No 3. — P. 193–202.
Bibliographic description (International): Operacz A. The effective hydropower potential of the Mszanka River in South Poland – the course of estimation / Agnieszka Operacz, Tomasz Kotowski, Piotr Bugajski // Environmental problems. — Lviv : Lviv Politechnic Publishing House, 2018. — Vol 3. — No 3. — P. 193–202.
Is part of: Environmental problems, 3 (3), 2018
Issue: 3
Issue Date: 26-Oct-2018
Publisher: Lviv Politechnic Publishing House
Place of the edition/event: Львів
Lviv
Keywords: hydropower potential
RES
sustainable management
small HPP
Number of pages: 10
Page range: 193-202
Start page: 193
End page: 202
Abstract: The aim of the paper was to calculate the actual (called “effective”) hydropower potential based on the identification of real possibilities of small hydro power plants realization. As an example river Mszanka in South Poland was chosen. The course of estimation was shown in Polish conditions of law, procedures and environmental barriers. The comparison of estimated values of effective potential was done with theoretical and technical potential.
URI: https://ena.lpnu.ua/handle/ntb/45993
Copyright owner: © Національний університет “Львівська політехніка”, 2018
© Operacz A., Kotowski T., Bugajski P., 2018
URL for reference material: https://doi.org/10.1002/ep.12121
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.141
https://bip.malopolska.pl/rzgwkrakow/Article/get/id,848610.html
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.098
http://ekonomiaisrodowisko.pl/uploads/ekonomiaisrodowisko52/06_operacz.pdf
https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/59294
http://www.restor-hydro.eu/en/tools/mills-map/
References (Ukraine): 1. Allwood J. M., V. Bosetti, N. K. Dubash, L. GómezEcheverri, von Stechow C.: Glossary. In: Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA 2014.
2. Stangeland A., Grini G.: The potential and barriers for RE. Bellona Paper, Oslo, Norway, 2007.
3. Hoogwijk M., Graus W.: Global potential of RES: a literature assessment. Background report prepared by order of REN21. Ecofys, PECSNL072975, 2008.
4. Krewitt W., Simon S., Pregger T.: RE deployment potentials in large economies. DLR (German Aerospace Center), 2008.
5. Resch G., Held A., Faber T., Panzer C., Toro F., Haas R., 2008. Energy Policy, 2008, 36 (11), 4048. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2008.06.029
6. Verbruggen A., Fischedick M., Moomaw W., Weir T., Nadai A., Nilsson L. J., Nyboer J., Sathaye J., Energy Policy, 2010, 38 (2), 850.
7. Ataei, A., Biglari, M., Nedaei, M., Assareh, E., Choi, J.-K., Yoo, C. and Adaramola, M. S. Environ. Prog. Sustainable Energy 2015, 34, 1521. https://doi.org/10.1002/ep.12121
8. Esen H., Mustafa I., Esen M. Building and Environment, 2007, 42(5), 1955. DOI:10.1016/j.buildenv.2006.04.007
9. Izadyar N., Ong Ch. H., Chong W. T., Leong K. Y. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2016, 62, 908. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2016.05.005
10. Resch G., Held A., Faber T., Panzer Ch., Toro F., Haas R. Energy Policy, 2008, 36 (11), 4048. doi:10.1016/j.enpol. 2008.06.029
11. Zimny J., Michalak P., Bielik S., Szczotka K. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2013, 21, 117. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2012.12.049
12. Ferreira J. H. I., Camacho J. R. C., Malagoli J. A., Guimaraes JR. S. C. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2016, 56, 380. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.11.035
13. Farooq M. K., Kumar S. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev, 2013, 20, 240. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2012.09.042
14. Painuly J. P. Renew Energy, 2001, 24 (1), 73. doi:10.1016/S0960-1481(00)00186-5
15. Sample J. E., Duncan N., Ferguson M., Cooksley S. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2015, 52, 111. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.07.071
16. Morales S., Alvares C., Acevedo C., Diaz C., Rodriguez M., Pacheco L. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2015, 50, 1650. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.06.026
17. Operacz, A. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2017, 75 (9), 1453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.141
18. Resolution no 4/2014 of the RZGW Director in Krakow [in Polish] https://bip.malopolska.pl/rzgwkrakow/Article/get/id,848610.html
19. IMGW 1980: Przepływy charakterystyczne rzek Polski w latach 1951–1970. WKiŁ., Warszawa [in Polish].
20. Grela J., Stochliński T. 2005: O metodach wyznaczenia wielkości przepływu nienaruszalnego. “Aura” no. 6. [in Polish]
21. Operacz A., Wałęga A., Cupak A., Tomaszewska B. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, 193, 575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.098
22. Operacz A. Economics and Environment, 2015, 1(52), 100. [in Polish] http://ekonomiaisrodowisko.pl/uploads/ekonomiaisrodowisko52/06_operacz.pdf
23. Kostrzewa H. 2005: Weryfikacja kryteriów i wielkości przepływu nienaruszalnego dla rzek Polski. Materiały Badawcze, Seria Gospodarka Wodna i Ochrona Wód., Warszawa. [in Polish]
24. Wałęga A., Młyński D., Kokoszka R., Miernik W. 2014. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 24 (6), 2663–2676. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/59294
25. Restor-Hydro map, http://www.restor-hydro.eu/en/tools/mills-map/
26. Kaczor G., Bergel T., Bugajski P., Pijanowski J. 2015. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, Hard Olsztyn. Vol. 24, No. 1, 107–114. [DOI: 10.15244/pjoes/28355]
References (International): 1. Allwood J. M., V. Bosetti, N. K. Dubash, L. GómezEcheverri, von Stechow C., Glossary. In: Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA 2014.
2. Stangeland A., Grini G., The potential and barriers for RE. Bellona Paper, Oslo, Norway, 2007.
3. Hoogwijk M., Graus W., Global potential of RES: a literature assessment. Background report prepared by order of REN21. Ecofys, PECSNL072975, 2008.
4. Krewitt W., Simon S., Pregger T., RE deployment potentials in large economies. DLR (German Aerospace Center), 2008.
5. Resch G., Held A., Faber T., Panzer C., Toro F., Haas R., 2008. Energy Policy, 2008, 36 (11), 4048. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2008.06.029
6. Verbruggen A., Fischedick M., Moomaw W., Weir T., Nadai A., Nilsson L. J., Nyboer J., Sathaye J., Energy Policy, 2010, 38 (2), 850.
7. Ataei, A., Biglari, M., Nedaei, M., Assareh, E., Choi, J.-K., Yoo, C. and Adaramola, M. S. Environ. Prog. Sustainable Energy 2015, 34, 1521. https://doi.org/10.1002/ep.12121
8. Esen H., Mustafa I., Esen M. Building and Environment, 2007, 42(5), 1955. DOI:10.1016/j.buildenv.2006.04.007
9. Izadyar N., Ong Ch. H., Chong W. T., Leong K. Y. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2016, 62, 908. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2016.05.005
10. Resch G., Held A., Faber T., Panzer Ch., Toro F., Haas R. Energy Policy, 2008, 36 (11), 4048. doi:10.1016/j.enpol. 2008.06.029
11. Zimny J., Michalak P., Bielik S., Szczotka K. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2013, 21, 117. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2012.12.049
12. Ferreira J. H. I., Camacho J. R. C., Malagoli J. A., Guimaraes JR. S. C. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2016, 56, 380. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.11.035
13. Farooq M. K., Kumar S. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev, 2013, 20, 240. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2012.09.042
14. Painuly J. P. Renew Energy, 2001, 24 (1), 73. doi:10.1016/S0960-1481(00)00186-5
15. Sample J. E., Duncan N., Ferguson M., Cooksley S. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2015, 52, 111. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.07.071
16. Morales S., Alvares C., Acevedo C., Diaz C., Rodriguez M., Pacheco L. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2015, 50, 1650. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.06.026
17. Operacz, A. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2017, 75 (9), 1453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.141
18. Resolution no 4/2014 of the RZGW Director in Krakow [in Polish] https://bip.malopolska.pl/rzgwkrakow/Article/get/id,848610.html
19. IMGW 1980: Przepływy charakterystyczne rzek Polski w latach 1951–1970. WKiŁ., Warszawa [in Polish].
20. Grela J., Stochliński T. 2005: O metodach wyznaczenia wielkości przepływu nienaruszalnego. "Aura" no. 6. [in Polish]
21. Operacz A., Wałęga A., Cupak A., Tomaszewska B. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, 193, 575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.098
22. Operacz A. Economics and Environment, 2015, 1(52), 100. [in Polish] http://ekonomiaisrodowisko.pl/uploads/ekonomiaisrodowisko52/06_operacz.pdf
23. Kostrzewa H. 2005: Weryfikacja kryteriów i wielkości przepływu nienaruszalnego dla rzek Polski. Materiały Badawcze, Seria Gospodarka Wodna i Ochrona Wód., Warszawa. [in Polish]
24. Wałęga A., Młyński D., Kokoszka R., Miernik W. 2014. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 24 (6), 2663–2676. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/59294
25. Restor-Hydro map, http://www.restor-hydro.eu/en/tools/mills-map/
26. Kaczor G., Bergel T., Bugajski P., Pijanowski J. 2015. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, Hard Olsztyn. Vol. 24, No. 1, 107–114. [DOI: 10.15244/pjoes/28355]
Content type: Article
Appears in Collections:Environmental Problems. – 2018. – Vol. 3, No. 3

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2018v3n3_Operacz_A-The_effective_hydropower_193-202.pdf511.39 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
2018v3n3_Operacz_A-The_effective_hydropower_193-202__COVER.png434.48 kBimage/pngView/Open
Show full item record


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.