https://oldena.lpnu.ua/handle/ntb/43907| Title: | Hybrid development of modern enterprises |
| Authors: | Kozyk, V. Zalutska, Kh. Zalutskiy, V. |
| Affiliation: | Lviv Polytechnic National University |
| Bibliographic description (Ukraine): | Kozyk V. Hybrid development of modern enterprises / V. Kozyk, Kh. Zalutska, V. Zalutskiy // Economics, Entrepreneurship, Management. — Lviv : Lviv Politechnic Publishing House, 2018. — Vol 5. — No 1. — P. 39–46. |
| Bibliographic description (International): | Kozyk V. Hybrid development of modern enterprises / V. Kozyk, Kh. Zalutska, V. Zalutskiy // Economics, Entrepreneurship, Management. — Lviv : Lviv Politechnic Publishing House, 2018. — Vol 5. — No 1. — P. 39–46. |
| Is part of: | Economics, Entrepreneurship, Management, 1 (5), 2018 |
| Issue: | 1 |
| Volume: | 5 |
| Issue Date: | 10-Feb-2018 |
| Publisher: | Lviv Politechnic Publishing House |
| Place of the edition/event: | Lviv |
| UDC: | 334.758 |
| Keywords: | diversification integration hybrid growth business unit strategy |
| Number of pages: | 8 |
| Page range: | 39-46 |
| Start page: | 39 |
| End page: | 46 |
| Abstract: | Long-term effective development of enterprises in the modern dynamic conditions, as a rule, provides the use of certain variants of integration or diversification growth. However, as research shows, in many cases it is advisable to choose a hybrid variant of such growth due to the formation of business structures by combining concrete business units of several enterprises. At the same time, enterprises whose business units are involved in the formation of hybrid structures can continue their normal functioning with other own business units, using the residual capabilities of business units that are part of the hybrid structure. With the help of comparative analysis, generalization and system approach in the work, variants of hybrid growth are highlighted and one of them is described for the tourist industry. The efficiency of the ski resort with the use of concentric growth strategies, concentric and conglomerate diversification, and hybrid growth are calculated. The results confirmed the effectiveness of hybrid growth for enterprises with insufficient financial resources and strategic opportunities and successful enterprises by integrating certain business units of one enterprise with specialized business units of other enterprises. The difficulties of using hybrid growth variants for enterprises of other industries are determined and recommendations for their solution are given. |
| URI: | https://ena.lpnu.ua/handle/ntb/43907 |
| ISSN: | 2312-3435 |
| Copyright owner: | © Національний університет "Львівська політехніка", 2018 |
| URL for reference material: | http://www |
| References (Ukraine): | 1. Butenko, NV (2003). Diversification of production: goals and strategies for implementation. Economy of agroindustrial complex, 7, 109–114 [in Ukrainian]. 2. Semenov, G.A, & Kremenchutska, Yu.R. (2012). Diversification as a factor in stabilizing the sustainable development of the enterprise. State and regions. Series: Economics and Business, 3,215–220 [in Ukrainian]. 3. Rudyk, N. B. (2005). Conglomerate mergers and acquisitions. A book about the benefits and harms of non-core assets. Moscow: Delo [in Russian]. 4. Petrov, V.M. (2010). Typology of production diversification in planning the strategic development of an industrial company. Journal of Economic Sciences. Questions of theory and practice, 5(66), 88–91 [in Russian]. 5. Shevchuk, I. (2007). Strategies for diversifying the activities of a transnational company in terms of its target function. Bulletin of the Kiev National University named after. T. Shevchenko: Economics, 98, 53–56 [in Ukrainian]. 6. Gosteva, I.S. (n.d.) Concepts and types of integrated enterprises. Retrieved from http://www. dspace.snu.edu.ua:8080/jspui/bitstream/123456789/601/1/gosteva.pdf 90 [in Ukrainian]. 7. Salimova, L. R. (2011). Factors of formation of corporate associations of conglomerate type. Bulletin of SamGu, 9(90), 97–100 [in Russian]. 8. Alekseev, I. V., & Bondarenko, L. P. (2010). Formation of integration unions on the basis of industrial and financial groups as a factor in the development of innovation activities in Ukraine. BusinessInform, 11, 108-111 [in Ukrainian]. 9. Kovalevskaya, K. A. (2009). Modern forms of integrated enterprises in the conditions of globalization. Actual problems of the economy,5(95), 145–148 [in Ukrainian]. 10. Zverbny, A.S., & Drimalovskaya, Kh. V. (2013). Diversification in integrated structures in a globalizing environment. Scientific and Theoretical Journal of Khmelnytskyi Economic University “Science and Economics”, 4(32),118–123 [in Ukrainian]. 11. Kuzmin, O. E., Feshchur, R. V., & Drimalovskaya, Kh. V. (2015). Concept and tools of the project's departure to diversify the activities of the enterprise. Actual problems of the economy,12(174), 415–422 [in Ukrainian]. 12. Skybinskyy, O. S., & Drymalovska, Ch. V. (2014). Analisys of diversification on machine-building enterprises: innovative approach. Economics, Entrepreneursip, Management, 2, 55–59 [in English]. 13. Kozyk, V. V., & Zalutska, Kh. Ya. (2017). Formation of interaction of participants of diversified companies through the strategy of behavior of their business units. Formation and development of interaction of participants of innovation infrastructure: theoretical and applied aspects, (pp. 98–111). Lviv: Rastr-7 [in Ukrainian]. 14. Kozyk, V. V., & Zalutska, Kh. Ya. (2016). Features of the functioning of diversified companie. Journal “The scientific heritage”, Vol. 1, 3 (3), 4–6 [in Ukrainian]. 15. Kozyk, V. V., & Zalutska, Kh. Ya. (2017). Formation of business units of diversified enterprises. Actual problems of the economy,No. 3 (189), 116–123 [in Ukrainian]. |
| References (International): | 1. Butenko, NV (2003). Diversification of production: goals and strategies for implementation. Economy of agroindustrial complex, 7, 109–114 [in Ukrainian]. 2. Semenov, G.A, & Kremenchutska, Yu.R. (2012). Diversification as a factor in stabilizing the sustainable development of the enterprise. State and regions. Series: Economics and Business, 3,215–220 [in Ukrainian]. 3. Rudyk, N. B. (2005). Conglomerate mergers and acquisitions. A book about the benefits and harms of non-core assets. Moscow: Delo [in Russian]. 4. Petrov, V.M. (2010). Typology of production diversification in planning the strategic development of an industrial company. Journal of Economic Sciences. Questions of theory and practice, 5(66), 88–91 [in Russian]. 5. Shevchuk, I. (2007). Strategies for diversifying the activities of a transnational company in terms of its target function. Bulletin of the Kiev National University named after. T. Shevchenko: Economics, 98, 53–56 [in Ukrainian]. 6. Gosteva, I.S. (n.d.) Concepts and types of integrated enterprises. Retrieved from http://www. dspace.snu.edu.ua:8080/jspui/bitstream/123456789/601/1/gosteva.pdf 90 [in Ukrainian]. 7. Salimova, L. R. (2011). Factors of formation of corporate associations of conglomerate type. Bulletin of SamGu, 9(90), 97–100 [in Russian]. 8. Alekseev, I. V., & Bondarenko, L. P. (2010). Formation of integration unions on the basis of industrial and financial groups as a factor in the development of innovation activities in Ukraine. BusinessInform, 11, 108-111 [in Ukrainian]. 9. Kovalevskaya, K. A. (2009). Modern forms of integrated enterprises in the conditions of globalization. Actual problems of the economy,5(95), 145–148 [in Ukrainian]. 10. Zverbny, A.S., & Drimalovskaya, Kh. V. (2013). Diversification in integrated structures in a globalizing environment. Scientific and Theoretical Journal of Khmelnytskyi Economic University "Science and Economics", 4(32),118–123 [in Ukrainian]. 11. Kuzmin, O. E., Feshchur, R. V., & Drimalovskaya, Kh. V. (2015). Concept and tools of the project's departure to diversify the activities of the enterprise. Actual problems of the economy,12(174), 415–422 [in Ukrainian]. 12. Skybinskyy, O. S., & Drymalovska, Ch. V. (2014). Analisys of diversification on machine-building enterprises: innovative approach. Economics, Entrepreneursip, Management, 2, 55–59 [in English]. 13. Kozyk, V. V., & Zalutska, Kh. Ya. (2017). Formation of interaction of participants of diversified companies through the strategy of behavior of their business units. Formation and development of interaction of participants of innovation infrastructure: theoretical and applied aspects, (pp. 98–111). Lviv: Rastr-7 [in Ukrainian]. 14. Kozyk, V. V., & Zalutska, Kh. Ya. (2016). Features of the functioning of diversified companie. Journal "The scientific heritage", Vol. 1, 3 (3), 4–6 [in Ukrainian]. 15. Kozyk, V. V., & Zalutska, Kh. Ya. (2017). Formation of business units of diversified enterprises. Actual problems of the economy,No. 3 (189), 116–123 [in Ukrainian]. |
| Content type: | Article |
| Appears in Collections: | Economics, Entrepreneurship, Management. – 2018. – Vol. 5, No. 1 |
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018v5n1_Kozyk_V-Hybrid_development_of_modern_39-46.pdf | 175.64 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open | |
| 2018v5n1_Kozyk_V-Hybrid_development_of_modern_39-46__COVER.png | 430.09 kB | image/png | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.