Skip navigation

putin IS MURDERER

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://oldena.lpnu.ua/handle/ntb/42590
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorКадикало, Андрій
dc.contributor.authorKadykalo, Andrii
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-05T08:03:41Z-
dc.date.available2018-09-05T08:03:41Z-
dc.date.created2017-10-25
dc.date.issued2017-10-25
dc.identifier.citationКадикало А. Вплив ідей Канта на формування природничо-наукової гіпотези простору / Андрій Кадикало // Humanitarian Vision. — Lviv : Lviv Politechnic Publishing House, 2017. — Vol 3. — No 2. — P. 99–104.
dc.identifier.urihttps://ena.lpnu.ua/handle/ntb/42590-
dc.description.abstractРозглянуто еволюцію та трансформацію уявлень про простір у філософії Канта. Пояснено причини відмови Канта від уявлень про абсолютний простір. За допомогою герменевтичного методу зроблено висновок, що внесок Канта сприяв розвитку наукових теорій про простір у природничих науках, зокрема мав вплив на концепції Гемгольца, Пуанкаре та інших.
dc.description.abstractThe author considers evolution and transformation definition of space in Kant’s philosophy. Kant’s conception of space had a big and important influence on natural scientific knowledge. I emphasize that Kant’s conception of space has been changed. In the beginning of his scientific career, Kant was considered space as absolutely and objective. It is almost the same as Isaac Newton’s conception of space. German philosopher does think about absoluteness of space as independent from human perception. The article explains that objective space has itself parameters—move and orderliness. Kant’s idea about the move of space was very progressive and modern for his epoch. Kant does not explain absolutely space. He assumed that space is evidently in perception that makes you believe that something is true or exists. However, in secondperiod German philosopher changed his opinion: Kant is going to prove that space is objective and independent of human perception. The author explains: that Kant could not do that. Kant understood this problem and existence of the reason of this complexity. He discovered that definition of space must have marks, physical things or body, matter. Kant discovered the idea that human knows about space with help of the pure contemplation. Pure contemplation is out of limits of reason or sense – Kant’s conclusion. The article examines evolution Kant’s idea about space after him. Physical body and their motion were important in Helmholtz’s conception. His conception was coalescence natural science and psychology. It is part of psychology which had Kantian’s basis. Finally, French scientist and philosopher Henri Poincare assume about relativity and passive of space. The general conclusion of this article is that Kant got closer geometry and physics, imaginary and actually.
dc.format.extent99-104
dc.language.isouk
dc.publisherLviv Politechnic Publishing House
dc.relation.ispartofHumanitarian Vision, 2 (3), 2017
dc.subjectпростір
dc.subjectоб’єкт
dc.subjectрух
dc.subjectчистий розум
dc.subjectчуття
dc.subjectspace
dc.subjectobject
dc.subjectmotion
dc.subjectpure reason
dc.subjectsense
dc.titleВплив ідей Канта на формування природничо-наукової гіпотези простору
dc.title.alternativeKant’s ideas and their influence on the formation of natural and scientific hypothesis of the space
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.holder© Національний університет "Львівська політехніка", 2017
dc.rights.holder© Кадикало А., 2017
dc.contributor.affiliationНаціональний університет “Львівська політехніка”
dc.format.pages6
dc.identifier.citationenKadykalo A. Kant’s ideas and their influence on the formation of natural and scientific hypothesis of the space / Andrii Kadykalo // Humanitarian Vision. — Lviv : Lviv Politechnic Publishing House, 2017. — Vol 3. — No 2. — P. 99–104.
dc.relation.referencesҐаєр, М. (2007). Світ Канта: Біографія. Київ: Юніверс.
dc.relation.referencesКант, И. (2007). Наследие и проект. Научное издание.
dc.relation.referencesМосква: Канон + РООИ “Реабилитация”.
dc.relation.referencesКадикало, А. (2016). Аспекти трансформації орієнтирів
dc.relation.referencesнаукового мислення. Практична філософія, 4, 134–140.
dc.relation.referencesКант, І. (2000). Критика чистого розуму. Київ: Юніверс.
dc.relation.referencesПавлов, В. (2004). Простір та час як епістемологічні
dc.relation.referencesперепони пізнання. Мультиверсум. Філософський
dc.relation.referencesальманах, 41, 175–183.
dc.relation.referencesBitbol, M., Kerszberg, P., Petitot, J. (2009). Constituting
dc.relation.referencesObjectivity. Transcendental Perspectives on Modern Physics.
dc.relation.referencesDordrecht: Springer.
dc.relation.referencesShabel, L. (2003). Reflections on Kant’s concept (and
dc.relation.referencesintuition) of space. Studies in History and Philosophy of
dc.relation.referencesScience, 34, 45–57.
dc.relation.referencesHatfield, G., Kitcher, P., Melnick, A. (2011). The
dc.relation.referencesCambridge Companion 104h Kant and Modern Philosophy
dc.relation.references(Cambridge Companions 104h Philosophy). 2nd revised
dc.relation.referencesEdition. Cambridge University Press.
dc.relation.referencesVinci, C. T. (2015). Space, Geometry, and Kant`s
dc.relation.referencesTranscendental Deduction of the Categories. Oxford University
dc.relation.referencesPress.
dc.relation.referencesenBitbol, M., Kerszberg, P., Petitot, J. (2009).
dc.relation.referencesenConstituting Objectivity. Transcendental Perspectives on
dc.relation.referencesenModern Physics. Dordrecht: Springer.
dc.relation.referencesenGeier, M. (2007). Kant’s World. Biography. [In
dc.relation.referencesenUkrainian]. Kyiv: Universe.
dc.relation.referencesenHatfield, G., Kitcher, P., Melnick, A. (2011). The
dc.relation.referencesenCambridge Companion 104h Kant and Modern Philosophy
dc.relation.referencesen(Cambridge Companions 104h Philosophy). 2nd revised
dc.relation.referencesenEdition. Cambridge University Press.
dc.relation.referencesenKadykalo, A. (2016). The Aspects of Transformation of
dc.relation.referencesenthe Orientations of Scientific Thinking. [In Ukrainian].
dc.relation.referencesenPractical Philosophy, 4, 134–140.
dc.relation.referencesenKant, I. (2007). Heritage and Project. Scientific Edition.
dc.relation.referencesen[In Russian]. Moscow: Kanon + ROOI “Reabilitation”.
dc.relation.referencesenKant, I.(2000). Critics of Pure Reason. [In Ukrainian].
dc.relation.referencesenKyiv: Universe.
dc.relation.referencesenPavlov, V. (2004). Space and Time as the
dc.relation.referencesenEpistemological Obstacles of Cognition. [In Ukrainian].
dc.relation.referencesenPhilosophical Almanah, 41, 175–183.
dc.relation.referencesenShabel L. (2003). Reflections on Kant`s Concept (and
dc.relation.referencesenIntuition) of Space. Studies in History and Philosophy of
dc.relation.referencesenScience, 34, 45–57.
dc.relation.referencesenVinci, Th. (2015). Space, Geometry, and Kant`s
dc.relation.referencesenTranscendental Deduction of the Categories .Oxford University
dc.relation.referencesenPress.
dc.citation.volume3
dc.citation.issue2
dc.citation.spage99
dc.citation.epage104
dc.coverage.placenameLviv
dc.subject.udc113/119
dc.subject.udc165
Appears in Collections:Humanitarian Vision. – 2017. – Vol. 3, No. 2

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2017v3n2_Kadykalo_A-Kants_ideas_and_their_99-104.pdf568.75 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
2017v3n2_Kadykalo_A-Kants_ideas_and_their_99-104__COVER.png429.25 kBimage/pngView/Open
Show simple item record


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.