DC Field | Value | Language |
dc.contributor.author | Кадикало, Андрій | |
dc.contributor.author | Kadykalo, Andrii | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-09-05T08:03:41Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2018-09-05T08:03:41Z | - |
dc.date.created | 2017-10-25 | |
dc.date.issued | 2017-10-25 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Кадикало А. Вплив ідей Канта на формування природничо-наукової гіпотези простору / Андрій Кадикало // Humanitarian Vision. — Lviv : Lviv Politechnic Publishing House, 2017. — Vol 3. — No 2. — P. 99–104. | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://ena.lpnu.ua/handle/ntb/42590 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Розглянуто еволюцію та трансформацію уявлень про простір у філософії Канта. Пояснено причини відмови
Канта від уявлень про абсолютний простір. За допомогою герменевтичного методу зроблено висновок, що внесок
Канта сприяв розвитку наукових теорій про простір у природничих науках, зокрема мав вплив на концепції
Гемгольца, Пуанкаре та інших. | |
dc.description.abstract | The author considers evolution and transformation definition of space in Kant’s philosophy. Kant’s conception of
space had a big and important influence on natural scientific knowledge. I emphasize that Kant’s conception of space has
been changed. In the beginning of his scientific career, Kant was considered space as absolutely and objective. It is almost
the same as Isaac Newton’s conception of space. German philosopher does think about absoluteness of space as independent
from human perception. The article explains that objective space has itself parameters—move and orderliness. Kant’s idea
about the move of space was very progressive and modern for his epoch. Kant does not explain absolutely space. He
assumed that space is evidently in perception that makes you believe that something is true or exists. However, in secondperiod
German philosopher changed his opinion: Kant is going to prove that space is objective and independent of human
perception. The author explains: that Kant could not do that. Kant understood this problem and existence of the reason of
this complexity. He discovered that definition of space must have marks, physical things or body, matter. Kant discovered
the idea that human knows about space with help of the pure contemplation. Pure contemplation is out of limits of reason or
sense – Kant’s conclusion.
The article examines evolution Kant’s idea about space after him. Physical body and their motion were important in
Helmholtz’s conception. His conception was coalescence natural science and psychology. It is part of psychology which had
Kantian’s basis. Finally, French scientist and philosopher Henri Poincare assume about relativity and passive of space. The
general conclusion of this article is that Kant got closer geometry and physics, imaginary and actually. | |
dc.format.extent | 99-104 | |
dc.language.iso | uk | |
dc.publisher | Lviv Politechnic Publishing House | |
dc.relation.ispartof | Humanitarian Vision, 2 (3), 2017 | |
dc.subject | простір | |
dc.subject | об’єкт | |
dc.subject | рух | |
dc.subject | чистий розум | |
dc.subject | чуття | |
dc.subject | space | |
dc.subject | object | |
dc.subject | motion | |
dc.subject | pure reason | |
dc.subject | sense | |
dc.title | Вплив ідей Канта на формування природничо-наукової гіпотези простору | |
dc.title.alternative | Kant’s ideas and their influence on the formation of natural and scientific hypothesis of the space | |
dc.type | Article | |
dc.rights.holder | © Національний університет "Львівська політехніка", 2017 | |
dc.rights.holder | © Кадикало А., 2017 | |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Національний університет “Львівська політехніка” | |
dc.format.pages | 6 | |
dc.identifier.citationen | Kadykalo A. Kant’s ideas and their influence on the formation of natural and scientific hypothesis of the space / Andrii Kadykalo // Humanitarian Vision. — Lviv : Lviv Politechnic Publishing House, 2017. — Vol 3. — No 2. — P. 99–104. | |
dc.relation.references | Ґаєр, М. (2007). Світ Канта: Біографія. Київ: Юніверс. | |
dc.relation.references | Кант, И. (2007). Наследие и проект. Научное издание. | |
dc.relation.references | Москва: Канон + РООИ “Реабилитация”. | |
dc.relation.references | Кадикало, А. (2016). Аспекти трансформації орієнтирів | |
dc.relation.references | наукового мислення. Практична філософія, 4, 134–140. | |
dc.relation.references | Кант, І. (2000). Критика чистого розуму. Київ: Юніверс. | |
dc.relation.references | Павлов, В. (2004). Простір та час як епістемологічні | |
dc.relation.references | перепони пізнання. Мультиверсум. Філософський | |
dc.relation.references | альманах, 41, 175–183. | |
dc.relation.references | Bitbol, M., Kerszberg, P., Petitot, J. (2009). Constituting | |
dc.relation.references | Objectivity. Transcendental Perspectives on Modern Physics. | |
dc.relation.references | Dordrecht: Springer. | |
dc.relation.references | Shabel, L. (2003). Reflections on Kant’s concept (and | |
dc.relation.references | intuition) of space. Studies in History and Philosophy of | |
dc.relation.references | Science, 34, 45–57. | |
dc.relation.references | Hatfield, G., Kitcher, P., Melnick, A. (2011). The | |
dc.relation.references | Cambridge Companion 104h Kant and Modern Philosophy | |
dc.relation.references | (Cambridge Companions 104h Philosophy). 2nd revised | |
dc.relation.references | Edition. Cambridge University Press. | |
dc.relation.references | Vinci, C. T. (2015). Space, Geometry, and Kant`s | |
dc.relation.references | Transcendental Deduction of the Categories. Oxford University | |
dc.relation.references | Press. | |
dc.relation.referencesen | Bitbol, M., Kerszberg, P., Petitot, J. (2009). | |
dc.relation.referencesen | Constituting Objectivity. Transcendental Perspectives on | |
dc.relation.referencesen | Modern Physics. Dordrecht: Springer. | |
dc.relation.referencesen | Geier, M. (2007). Kant’s World. Biography. [In | |
dc.relation.referencesen | Ukrainian]. Kyiv: Universe. | |
dc.relation.referencesen | Hatfield, G., Kitcher, P., Melnick, A. (2011). The | |
dc.relation.referencesen | Cambridge Companion 104h Kant and Modern Philosophy | |
dc.relation.referencesen | (Cambridge Companions 104h Philosophy). 2nd revised | |
dc.relation.referencesen | Edition. Cambridge University Press. | |
dc.relation.referencesen | Kadykalo, A. (2016). The Aspects of Transformation of | |
dc.relation.referencesen | the Orientations of Scientific Thinking. [In Ukrainian]. | |
dc.relation.referencesen | Practical Philosophy, 4, 134–140. | |
dc.relation.referencesen | Kant, I. (2007). Heritage and Project. Scientific Edition. | |
dc.relation.referencesen | [In Russian]. Moscow: Kanon + ROOI “Reabilitation”. | |
dc.relation.referencesen | Kant, I.(2000). Critics of Pure Reason. [In Ukrainian]. | |
dc.relation.referencesen | Kyiv: Universe. | |
dc.relation.referencesen | Pavlov, V. (2004). Space and Time as the | |
dc.relation.referencesen | Epistemological Obstacles of Cognition. [In Ukrainian]. | |
dc.relation.referencesen | Philosophical Almanah, 41, 175–183. | |
dc.relation.referencesen | Shabel L. (2003). Reflections on Kant`s Concept (and | |
dc.relation.referencesen | Intuition) of Space. Studies in History and Philosophy of | |
dc.relation.referencesen | Science, 34, 45–57. | |
dc.relation.referencesen | Vinci, Th. (2015). Space, Geometry, and Kant`s | |
dc.relation.referencesen | Transcendental Deduction of the Categories .Oxford University | |
dc.relation.referencesen | Press. | |
dc.citation.volume | 3 | |
dc.citation.issue | 2 | |
dc.citation.spage | 99 | |
dc.citation.epage | 104 | |
dc.coverage.placename | Lviv | |
dc.subject.udc | 113/119 | |
dc.subject.udc | 165 | |
Appears in Collections: | Humanitarian Vision. – 2017. – Vol. 3, No. 2
|