https://oldena.lpnu.ua/handle/ntb/41240
Title: | Economic, environmental, marketing and logistic effects of intellectual capital resulting from the implementation of green supply chains |
Other Titles: | Економічні, екологічні, маркетингові і логістичні ефекти інтеллектуального капіталу в результаті імплементації “зелених” ланцюгів поставок |
Authors: | Мариняк, А. Maryniak, A. |
Affiliation: | Познанський університет економіки і бізнесу (Республіка Польща) Poznań unaversity of economics and business |
Bibliographic description (Ukraine): | Maryniak A. Economic, environmental, marketing and logistic effects of intellectual capital resulting from the implementation of green supply chains / A. Maryniak // Вісник Національного університету «Львівська політехніка». Серія: Логістика. — Львів : Видавництво Львівської політехніки, 2017. — № 863. — С. 285–294. |
Bibliographic description (International): | Maryniak A. Economic, environmental, marketing and logistic effects of intellectual capital resulting from the implementation of green supply chains / A. Maryniak // Visnyk Natsionalnoho universytetu "Lvivska politekhnika". Serie: Lohistyka. — Lviv : Vydavnytstvo Lvivskoi politekhniky, 2017. — No 863. — P. 285–294. |
Is part of: | Вісник Національного університету «Львівська політехніка». Серія: Логістика, 863, 2017 |
Journal/Collection: | Вісник Національного університету «Львівська політехніка». Серія: Логістика |
Issue: | 863 |
Issue Date: | 20-Jun-2017 |
Publisher: | Видавництво Львівської політехніки |
Place of the edition/event: | Львів |
UDC: | 65.012.34 338.432 |
Keywords: | інтелектуальний капітал “зелений” ланцюг поставок корпоративна соціальна відповідальність ланцюг поставок ефекти інтелектуального капіталу intellectual capital green supply chain corporate social responsibility supply chain and the effects of intellectual capital |
Number of pages: | 10 |
Page range: | 285-294 |
Start page: | 285 |
End page: | 294 |
Abstract: | Метою поданого теоретико-пізнавального і аналітичного дослідження є побудова
дослідницької моделі для оцінювання кореляції між інтелектуальним капіталом, що
бере участь в управлінні ланцюжком поставок і результатами, отриманими у результаті
реалізації “зелених” заходів у ланцюзі поставок. У результаті проведених досліджень ми
спостерігали зокрема, що вищий рівень людського капіталу пов’язаний з більшою
економічною ефективністю. Запропоновано деякі нові напрямки наукових досліджень, що грунтуються на “Ресурсному підході” та “Теорії зацікавлених сторін”. This is a theoretical-cognitive and analytical study, which aim is to construct a research model to measure the correlations between intellectual capital involved in the management of a supply chain and the results obtained from the implementation of green activities in a supply chain. This study is an attempt to deepen the subject related to the interplay of intellectual capital and Green Supply Chain Management (GSCM). The choice of the subject arises from: the research interests of the author, the fact that nowadays competition takes place on the level of supply chains, not on the level of individual companies and the awareness that there is a strong need to deepen the knowledge about intangible assets of companies in the context of improving environmental efficiency. The results obtained from green supply chain management depend on the level of intellectual capital development of companies. A developed IT system, an effective knowledge diffusion inside and outside of the organization, having certificates supporting supply chain management, a developed motivation system, long-term contracts with clients, a loyalty of suppliers and many more elements contributing to intellectual capital, probably facilitate the green supply management and simultaneously allows for obtaining better results in this area. The goal is to adopt the following hypothesis: H: The higher level of the development of intellectual capital (involved in supply chain management) is related to better results obtained through green activities implementation in a supply chain. The part of the questionnaire regarding intellectual capital consisted of 42 test items – 14 for each out of three types of capital. Regarding each test item, the respondents could mark one of the following answers: 2 (a declaration that the given element of capital included in the question is at a sufficient (high) level of development), 1 (a declaration that the given element of capital included in the question requires either implementation or development) or 3 (a declaration that the given element of capital included in the question doesn’t exists due to the characteristics of the company). As a result of the research we observed, among others, that the higher level of human capital is related to higher economic performance. In this article, we are also suggesting some new research directions with reference to Resource-Based View and Stakeholders Theory. On the basis of the obtained data, it can be claimed that companies, which have intellectual capital on a higher level obtain significantly better economic results in GSCM than companies, which have this capital on a lower level. For example, a well-developed training system, a motivation system, sharing non-codified knowledge, a huge experience of employees or limiting rotations of employees contributes to an easier implementation of green activities. The companies, which want to implement GSCM, should first verify the potential of such capital. Therefore, it seems that it is a critical point in the process of the implementation of green supply chains. Considering the relations of each type of capital, confirmed in numerous research, we can assume that relational and organizational capital have a meaning, but a secondary one. Human capital alone, in interaction with other types of capital improves significantly economic and marketing-logistic results. |
URI: | https://ena.lpnu.ua/handle/ntb/41240 |
Copyright owner: | ©Національний університет “Львівська політехніка”, 2017 © Мариняк А., 2017 |
URL for reference material: | http://yadda.icm.edu.pl/yadda/element/bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-7260f7fd-ba81-308e-b899-7cf2e0eeb40a http://www.sveiby.com/articles/ |
References (Ukraine): | 1. Akhtar Ch.S., Bahru J. Can Intellectual Capital of SMEs Help in Their Sustainability Efforts, Journal of Management Research.2015. No. 7(2). P. 82–97. 2. Arenhardt D., Battistella L. F., Arenhardt D. L., Grohmann M. Z. The Influence of the Green Innovation in the Search of Competitive Advantage of Enterprises of the Electrical and Electronic Brazilian Sectors, International Journal of Innovation Management. 2016. No. 20(1). P. 1650004-1-21. 3. Baresel-Bofinger A. C.R., Ketikidis P. H. Koh S. C.L., Cullen J. Role of Green Knowledge in the Environmental Transformation of the Supply Chain: The Case of Greek Manufacturing, International Journal of Knowledge-Based Development. 2011. No. 2(1). P. 107–128. 4. Bhateja A. K., Babbar R., Singh S., Sachdeva A. Study of Green Supply Chain Management in the Indian Manufacturing Industries: A Literature Review cum an Analytical Approach for the Measurement of Performance, Journal of Computational Engineering & Management. 2011. No. 13. P. 84-99. 5. Bombiak E. Kapitał intelektualny przedsiębiorstwa – kluczowy majątek współczesnych organizacji, Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Przyrodniczo-Humanistycznego w Siedlcach, Seria: Administracja i Zarządzanie. 2013. No. 96. P. 71–86. 6. Bratnicki M., Strużyna J. Przedsiębiorczość i kapitał intelektualny, Katowice: Wydawnictwo Akademii Ekonomicznej im. K. Adamieckiego w Katowicach, 2001. 7. Chen Y. S. The Positive Effect of Green Intellectual Capital on Competitive Advantages of Firms, Journal of Business Ethics. 2008. No. 77(3). P. 271–286. 8. Chien M. K., Shih L. H. An Empirical Study of the Implementation of Green Supply Chain Management Practices in the Electrical and Electronic Industry and their Relation to Organizational Performances, International Journal of Science and Technology. 2007. No. 4(3). P. 383–394. 9. Edvinsson L., Malone M. S. Intellectual Capital, London: Piatkus. 1997. 10. Ejsmont K., Werpachowski W. Model pomiaru i oceny kapitału intelektualnego w przedsiębiorstwie, Przedsiębiorczość i Zarządzanie. 2014. No. 15(6). P. 137–151. 11. Fang S. C., Lin S. L. Green Supply Chain Management as Competitive Advantage: A Perspective of Intellectual Capital, Chaoyang Business and Management Review. 2007. No. 6 (special edition). P. 79–102. 12. Huang C. L, Kung F. H. Environmental Consciousness and Intellectual Capital Management: Evidence from Taiwan’s Manufacturing Industry, Management Decision. 2011. No. 49(9). P. 1405–1425. 13. Kaczmarek B. Kapitał intelektualny (wiedza) a kreowanie wizji przedsiębiorstwa, Nierówności Społeczne a Wzrost Gospodarczy. 2005. No. 7. P. 319–329. 14. Ketikidis P. H., Bulata C., Lazuras L. The Intellectual Capital – Environmental Practices, Performance and Their Relationships in the Romanian Banking Sector, Proceedings of the 5th International Forum on Knowledge Asset Dynamics, Matera, Italy, 24–-25 June 2010. 2010. 15. Kotzab H., Mikkola J. H., Skjøtt-Larsen T. Complementary Theories to Supply Chain Management, Supply Chain Management. 2007. No. 12(4). P. 284–296. 16. Laosirihongthong T., Adebanjo D., Tan K. Green Supply Chain Management Practices and Performance, Industrial Management & Data Systems. 2013. No. 113(8). P. 1–27. 17. Lazuras L., Ketikidis P. H., Baresel-Bofinger A.C. R. Promoting Green Supply Chain Management: The Role of the Human Factor, 15th Panhellenic Logistics Conference and 1st Southeast European Congress on Supply Chain Management, Thessaloniki, Greece, 11–12 November 2011. 2011. 18. Li S., Ragu-Nathan B., Ragu-Nathan T. S., Rao S. S. The Impact of Supply Chain Management Practices on Competitive Advantage and Organizational Performance. 2016. Omega. No. 34. P. 107–112. 19. Liu Ch.Ch. Developing Green Intellectual Capital in Companies by AHP, Supply Chain Management and Information Systems (SCMIS), 2010 8th International Conference on Supply Chain Management and Information. 2010. 20. Michalski B. Kapitał intelektualny a międzynarodowa konkurencyjność gospodarki, w: Dudek M. (red.) Integracja i europejski rynek pracy, Uniwersytet Zielonogórski, Legnica – Zielona Góra: Wyższa Szkoła Menedżerska. 2006. P. 120–132. 21. Nycz M., Smok B. Jak mierzyć kapitał intelektualny, w: Porębska-Miąc T., Sroka H. (red.) Systemy wspomagania organizacji, Katowice: AE w Katowicach. 2005. P. 321–337. 22. Petty R., Guthrie J. Intellectual Capital Literature Review: Measurement, Reporting and Management, Journal of Intellectual Capital. 2000. No. 1(2). P. 155–176. 23. Piasny B. Zarządzanie wiedzą i kreowanie kapitału intelektualnego we współczesnym przedsiębiorstwie, Nierówności społeczne a wzrost gospodarczy. 2013. No. 36. P. 137–149. 24. Prusak R. Kapitał intelektualny jako element budowania przewag konkurencyjnych, Logistyka. 2014. No. 6. P. 12397–12400. 25. Rha J. S. The Impact of Green Supply Chain Practices on Supply Chain Performance, Nebraska: University of Nebraska. 2010. 26. Rószkiewicz M., Węziak-Białowolska D. Pomiar i modelowanie kapitału intelektualnego regionu na przykładzie Polski, Gospodarka Narodowa. 2008. No. 10. P. 45–67. 27. Różycka A. Zarządzanie kapitałem intelektualnym a innowacyjność przedsiębiorstwa w: Finanse. Rynki finansowe. Ubezpieczenia, Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego, Szczecin: Uniwersytet Szczeciński, 2013. No. 64 http://yadda.icm.edu.pl/yadda/element/bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-7260f7fd-ba81-308e-b899-7cf2e0eeb40a, P. 601–607. 28. Stewart T. A. Intellectual Capital: The New Wealth of Organizations, New York: Doubleday Dell Publishing Group, Inc.1997. 29. Sveiby K. E. The New Organizational Wealth: Managing and Measuring Knowledge Based Assets, San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Pub. Inc. 1997. 30. Sveiby K. E. Methods for Measuring Intangible Assets, 2001. http://www.sveiby.com/articles/ IntangibleMethods.htm. 31. Zhu Q., Sarkis J., Geng Y. Green Supply Chain Management in China: Pressures, Practices and Performance. International Journal of Operations & Production Management. 2005. No. 25(5). P. 449–468. 32. Zhu Q., Sarkis J. Relationships Between Operational Practices and Performance Among Early Adopters of Green Supply Chain Management Practices in Chinese Manufacturing Enterprises, Journal of Operations Management. 2004. No. 22(3). P. 265–289. 33. Yahya N. A., Arshad R., Kamaluddin A. Measuring Green Intellectual Capital in Malaysian Environmentally Sensitive Companies, International Journal Business and Management. 2014. No. 1(2). P. 92–96. 34. Yang Z., Sun J., Zhang Y., Wang Y. Green Information Systems, Green Culture and Green Innovation Effectiveness: a Triad Model, Taiwan, Republic of China: Proceedings of 20th Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems (PACIS 2016). 2016. |
References (International): | 1. Akhtar Ch.S., Bahru J. Can Intellectual Capital of SMEs Help in Their Sustainability Efforts, Journal of Management Research.2015. No. 7(2). P. 82–97. 2. Arenhardt D., Battistella L. F., Arenhardt D. L., Grohmann M. Z. The Influence of the Green Innovation in the Search of Competitive Advantage of Enterprises of the Electrical and Electronic Brazilian Sectors, International Journal of Innovation Management. 2016. No. 20(1). P. 1650004-1-21. 3. Baresel-Bofinger A. C.R., Ketikidis P. H. Koh S. C.L., Cullen J. Role of Green Knowledge in the Environmental Transformation of the Supply Chain: The Case of Greek Manufacturing, International Journal of Knowledge-Based Development. 2011. No. 2(1). P. 107–128. 4. Bhateja A. K., Babbar R., Singh S., Sachdeva A. Study of Green Supply Chain Management in the Indian Manufacturing Industries: A Literature Review cum an Analytical Approach for the Measurement of Performance, Journal of Computational Engineering & Management. 2011. No. 13. P. 84-99. 5. Bombiak E. Kapitał intelektualny przedsiębiorstwa – kluczowy majątek współczesnych organizacji, Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Przyrodniczo-Humanistycznego w Siedlcach, Seria: Administracja i Zarządzanie. 2013. No. 96. P. 71–86. 6. Bratnicki M., Strużyna J. Przedsiębiorczość i kapitał intelektualny, Katowice: Wydawnictwo Akademii Ekonomicznej im. K. Adamieckiego w Katowicach, 2001. 7. Chen Y. S. The Positive Effect of Green Intellectual Capital on Competitive Advantages of Firms, Journal of Business Ethics. 2008. No. 77(3). P. 271–286. 8. Chien M. K., Shih L. H. An Empirical Study of the Implementation of Green Supply Chain Management Practices in the Electrical and Electronic Industry and their Relation to Organizational Performances, International Journal of Science and Technology. 2007. No. 4(3). P. 383–394. 9. Edvinsson L., Malone M. S. Intellectual Capital, London: Piatkus. 1997. 10. Ejsmont K., Werpachowski W. Model pomiaru i oceny kapitału intelektualnego w przedsiębiorstwie, Przedsiębiorczość i Zarządzanie. 2014. No. 15(6). P. 137–151. 11. Fang S. C., Lin S. L. Green Supply Chain Management as Competitive Advantage: A Perspective of Intellectual Capital, Chaoyang Business and Management Review. 2007. No. 6 (special edition). P. 79–102. 12. Huang C. L, Kung F. H. Environmental Consciousness and Intellectual Capital Management: Evidence from Taiwan’s Manufacturing Industry, Management Decision. 2011. No. 49(9). P. 1405–1425. 13. Kaczmarek B. Kapitał intelektualny (wiedza) a kreowanie wizji przedsiębiorstwa, Nierówności Społeczne a Wzrost Gospodarczy. 2005. No. 7. P. 319–329. 14. Ketikidis P. H., Bulata C., Lazuras L. The Intellectual Capital – Environmental Practices, Performance and Their Relationships in the Romanian Banking Sector, Proceedings of the 5th International Forum on Knowledge Asset Dynamics, Matera, Italy, 24–-25 June 2010. 2010. 15. Kotzab H., Mikkola J. H., Skjøtt-Larsen T. Complementary Theories to Supply Chain Management, Supply Chain Management. 2007. No. 12(4). P. 284–296. 16. Laosirihongthong T., Adebanjo D., Tan K. Green Supply Chain Management Practices and Performance, Industrial Management & Data Systems. 2013. No. 113(8). P. 1–27. 17. Lazuras L., Ketikidis P. H., Baresel-Bofinger A.C. R. Promoting Green Supply Chain Management: The Role of the Human Factor, 15th Panhellenic Logistics Conference and 1st Southeast European Congress on Supply Chain Management, Thessaloniki, Greece, 11–12 November 2011. 2011. 18. Li S., Ragu-Nathan B., Ragu-Nathan T. S., Rao S. S. The Impact of Supply Chain Management Practices on Competitive Advantage and Organizational Performance. 2016. Omega. No. 34. P. 107–112. 19. Liu Ch.Ch. Developing Green Intellectual Capital in Companies by AHP, Supply Chain Management and Information Systems (SCMIS), 2010 8th International Conference on Supply Chain Management and Information. 2010. 20. Michalski B. Kapitał intelektualny a międzynarodowa konkurencyjność gospodarki, w: Dudek M. (red.) Integracja i europejski rynek pracy, Uniwersytet Zielonogórski, Legnica – Zielona Góra: Wyższa Szkoła Menedżerska. 2006. P. 120–132. 21. Nycz M., Smok B. Jak mierzyć kapitał intelektualny, w: Porębska-Miąc T., Sroka H. (red.) Systemy wspomagania organizacji, Katowice: AE w Katowicach. 2005. P. 321–337. 22. Petty R., Guthrie J. Intellectual Capital Literature Review: Measurement, Reporting and Management, Journal of Intellectual Capital. 2000. No. 1(2). P. 155–176. 23. Piasny B. Zarządzanie wiedzą i kreowanie kapitału intelektualnego we współczesnym przedsiębiorstwie, Nierówności społeczne a wzrost gospodarczy. 2013. No. 36. P. 137–149. 24. Prusak R. Kapitał intelektualny jako element budowania przewag konkurencyjnych, Logistyka. 2014. No. 6. P. 12397–12400. 25. Rha J. S. The Impact of Green Supply Chain Practices on Supply Chain Performance, Nebraska: University of Nebraska. 2010. 26. Rószkiewicz M., Węziak-Białowolska D. Pomiar i modelowanie kapitału intelektualnego regionu na przykładzie Polski, Gospodarka Narodowa. 2008. No. 10. P. 45–67. 27. Różycka A. Zarządzanie kapitałem intelektualnym a innowacyjność przedsiębiorstwa w: Finanse. Rynki finansowe. Ubezpieczenia, Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego, Szczecin: Uniwersytet Szczeciński, 2013. No. 64 http://yadda.icm.edu.pl/yadda/element/bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-7260f7fd-ba81-308e-b899-7cf2e0eeb40a, P. 601–607. 28. Stewart T. A. Intellectual Capital: The New Wealth of Organizations, New York: Doubleday Dell Publishing Group, Inc.1997. 29. Sveiby K. E. The New Organizational Wealth: Managing and Measuring Knowledge Based Assets, San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Pub. Inc. 1997. 30. Sveiby K. E. Methods for Measuring Intangible Assets, 2001. http://www.sveiby.com/articles/ IntangibleMethods.htm. 31. Zhu Q., Sarkis J., Geng Y. Green Supply Chain Management in China: Pressures, Practices and Performance. International Journal of Operations & Production Management. 2005. No. 25(5). P. 449–468. 32. Zhu Q., Sarkis J. Relationships Between Operational Practices and Performance Among Early Adopters of Green Supply Chain Management Practices in Chinese Manufacturing Enterprises, Journal of Operations Management. 2004. No. 22(3). P. 265–289. 33. Yahya N. A., Arshad R., Kamaluddin A. Measuring Green Intellectual Capital in Malaysian Environmentally Sensitive Companies, International Journal Business and Management. 2014. No. 1(2). P. 92–96. 34. Yang Z., Sun J., Zhang Y., Wang Y. Green Information Systems, Green Culture and Green Innovation Effectiveness: a Triad Model, Taiwan, Republic of China: Proceedings of 20th Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems (PACIS 2016). 2016. |
Content type: | Article |
Appears in Collections: | Логістика. – 2017. – №863 |
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
2017n863_Maryniak_A-Economic_environmental_285-294.pdf | 424.21 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open | |
2017n863_Maryniak_A-Economic_environmental_285-294__COVER.png | 415.12 kB | image/png | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.